All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
	marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	eyal.birger@gmail.com, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V2 5/6] bpf: Add MTU check for TC-BPF packets after egress hook
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2020 10:30:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201008103034.55c1b8bb@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7aeb6082-48a3-9b71-2e2c-10adeb5ee79a@iogearbox.net>

On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 23:37:00 +0200
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:

> On 10/7/20 6:23 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> [...]
> >   net/core/dev.c |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >   1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> > index b433098896b2..19406013f93e 100644
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -3870,6 +3870,7 @@ sch_handle_egress(struct sk_buff *skb, int *ret, struct net_device *dev)
> >   	switch (tcf_classify(skb, miniq->filter_list, &cl_res, false)) {
> >   	case TC_ACT_OK:
> >   	case TC_ACT_RECLASSIFY:
> > +		*ret = NET_XMIT_SUCCESS;
> >   		skb->tc_index = TC_H_MIN(cl_res.classid);
> >   		break;
> >   	case TC_ACT_SHOT:
> > @@ -4064,9 +4065,12 @@ static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> >   {
> >   	struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
> >   	struct netdev_queue *txq;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > +	bool mtu_check = false;
> > +#endif
> > +	bool again = false;
> >   	struct Qdisc *q;
> >   	int rc = -ENOMEM;
> > -	bool again = false;
> >   
> >   	skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> >   
> > @@ -4082,14 +4086,28 @@ static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> >   
> >   	qdisc_pkt_len_init(skb);
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > +	mtu_check = skb_is_redirected(skb);
> >   	skb->tc_at_ingress = 0;
> >   # ifdef CONFIG_NET_EGRESS
> >   	if (static_branch_unlikely(&egress_needed_key)) {
> > +		unsigned int len_orig = skb->len;
> > +
> >   		skb = sch_handle_egress(skb, &rc, dev);
> >   		if (!skb)
> >   			goto out;
> > +		/* BPF-prog ran and could have changed packet size beyond MTU */
> > +		if (rc == NET_XMIT_SUCCESS && skb->len > len_orig)
> > +			mtu_check = true;
> >   	}
> >   # endif
> > +	/* MTU-check only happens on "last" net_device in a redirect sequence
> > +	 * (e.g. above sch_handle_egress can steal SKB and skb_do_redirect it
> > +	 * either ingress or egress to another device).
> > +	 */  
> 
> Hmm, quite some overhead in fast path. 

Not really, normal fast-path already call is_skb_forwardable(). And it
already happens in existing code, ingress redirect code, which I remove
calling in patch 6.

(I have considered inlining is_skb_forwardable as a optimization for
general netstack dev_forward_skb)

> Also, won't this be checked multiple times on stacked devices? :(

I don't think it will be checked multiple times, because we have a
skb_reset_redirect() in ingress path (just after sch_handle_ingress()).

> Moreover, this missed the fact that 'real' qdiscs can have
> filters attached too, this would come after this check. Can't this instead be in
> driver layer for those that really need it? I would probably only drop the check
> as done in 1/6 and allow the BPF prog to do the validation if needed.

See other reply, this is likely what we will end-up with.

> > +	if (mtu_check && !is_skb_forwardable(dev, skb)) {
> > +		rc = -EMSGSIZE;
> > +		goto drop;
> > +	}
> >   #endif
> >   	/* If device/qdisc don't need skb->dst, release it right now while
> >   	 * its hot in this cpu cache.
> > @@ -4157,7 +4175,9 @@ static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
> >   
> >   	rc = -ENETDOWN;
> >   	rcu_read_unlock_bh();
> > -
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> > +drop:
> > +#endif
> >   	atomic_long_inc(&dev->tx_dropped);
> >   	kfree_skb_list(skb);
> >   	return rc;
> >   
> 



-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-08  8:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-07 16:22 [PATCH bpf-next V2 0/6] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling and enforcement Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 1/6] bpf: Remove MTU check in __bpf_skb_max_len Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 21:26   ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-07 23:46   ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2020-10-08 11:06     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-08 12:33       ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-10-08 14:07         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 2/6] bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 3/6] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:22 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 4/6] bpf: make it possible to identify BPF redirected SKBs Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 5/6] bpf: Add MTU check for TC-BPF packets after egress hook Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-07 21:37   ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-07 22:36     ` John Fastabend
2020-10-07 23:52       ` Maciej Żenczykowski
2020-10-08  3:19         ` John Fastabend
2020-10-08  8:07           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-10-08  8:25             ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-08  8:30     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2020-10-07 16:23 ` [PATCH bpf-next V2 6/6] bpf: drop MTU check when doing TC-BPF redirect to ingress Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201008103034.55c1b8bb@carbon \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaun@tigera.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.