From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D35C41604 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:54:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17A822241 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:54:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602658490; bh=CYCTvLft7EuscmHtaKH0AX7Z0ZbTnFcKn6jsV4mDXfs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=p5fQbpmh1n0ecXji2OARK24JNqdgY3N7COwGaOtHoqdPODHfOdnh6hddegkz/VOab sG3NJkW29sNHmw121eUtn2MYJPgrAi5V/f4ju2aTw1nFPyHNH40+5bat90kjSEIyA1 ysy2yhr9lflAH1ea9lNzkzUGsQWuMOOrVAamg6x0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727457AbgJNGys (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 02:54:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51188 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726147AbgJNGyr (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 02:54:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8F7E2222A; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:54:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602658487; bh=CYCTvLft7EuscmHtaKH0AX7Z0ZbTnFcKn6jsV4mDXfs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qxewTeZtO3iCbtRinyhP0odEb8dvDqDTVpoPx7POE//Uj98CZ8rUVzwZ731dYfNw7 Ki7GgS1Ds23+J/pYQEoNxfJEwgwcVliXQy2HTmr3KeXR6kjU9rLJ9jWkc3E6L6JrBl /NtehPR59JGYN1/yBWNQRgw8obCpTxPEOdFlRzDs= Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 08:55:22 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Roland Scheidegger Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Zack Rusin , Martin Krastev , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.8 050/124] drm/vmwgfx: Fix error handling in get_node Message-ID: <20201014065522.GA2762376@kroah.com> References: <20201012133146.834528783@linuxfoundation.org> <20201012133149.276124624@linuxfoundation.org> <703ec8e7-f036-948d-f155-73f0c946aeba@vmware.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <703ec8e7-f036-948d-f155-73f0c946aeba@vmware.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 05:55:31PM +0200, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > Hi, > > this commit should NOT be applied to 5.8. > It fixes a regression introduced by > 58e4d686d456c3e356439ae160ff4a0728940b8e (drm/ttm: cleanup > ttm_mem_type_manager_func.get_node interface v3) which is part of 5.9 > but not 5.8. > Applying this to 5.8 will very likely break things. I don't know why it > ended up as a candidate for 5.8. Now dropped, thanks. And it was probably picked up due to the wording in the changelog text, along with a lack of a "Fixes:" tag that pointed at the exact change it fixed up, which would have shown that this is a 5.9-only thing. thanks, greg k-h