diff for duplicates of <20201015054244.GD12218@lst.de> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index dbc96c6..6713dd5 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@ Requiring of_root to be passed explicitly would seem more natural to me than the magic NULL argument. There doesn't seem to be any precedent for that kind of calling convention either. + _______________________________________________ -iommu mailing list -iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org -https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu +linux-arm-kernel mailing list +linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org +http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 66caf98..6e40bbb 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -35,9 +35,10 @@ "Requiring of_root to be passed explicitly would seem more natural\n" "to me than the magic NULL argument. There doesn't seem to be any\n" "precedent for that kind of calling convention either.\n" + "\n" "_______________________________________________\n" - "iommu mailing list\n" - "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org\n" - https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu + "linux-arm-kernel mailing list\n" + "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\n" + http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -25a2fecc51a61fc3bdf0ae62fadcbe38a287c3998a8f0846d55b558e6d9ac66d +efb81a946fd39e3c02e9cd6ebe9374afca7f68e1b2cb504a2eb8290846e1a103
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index dbc96c6..34407b1 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -15,7 +15,3 @@ Requiring of_root to be passed explicitly would seem more natural to me than the magic NULL argument. There doesn't seem to be any precedent for that kind of calling convention either. -_______________________________________________ -iommu mailing list -iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org -https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 66caf98..93617a6 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -4,18 +4,18 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] of/address: Introduce of_dma_get_max_cpu_address()\0" "Date\0Thu, 15 Oct 2020 07:42:44 +0200\0" "To\0Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>\0" - "Cc\0devicetree@vger.kernel.org" + "Cc\0robh+dt@kernel.org" catalin.marinas@arm.com - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - jeremy.linton@arm.com + hch@lst.de ardb@kernel.org - iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org - robh+dt@kernel.org - linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org + linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com> - hch@lst.de + robin.murphy@arm.com linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org - " robin.murphy@arm.com\0" + linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org + jeremy.linton@arm.com + iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org + " devicetree@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "> +phys_addr_t __init of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np)\n" @@ -34,10 +34,6 @@ "\n" "Requiring of_root to be passed explicitly would seem more natural\n" "to me than the magic NULL argument. There doesn't seem to be any\n" - "precedent for that kind of calling convention either.\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "iommu mailing list\n" - "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org\n" - https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu + precedent for that kind of calling convention either. -25a2fecc51a61fc3bdf0ae62fadcbe38a287c3998a8f0846d55b558e6d9ac66d +abcf4178c5256b9710a4aa3534f676196ed53abb5a3ae1174979a12ceb92ca85
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.