From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66812C433E7 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7CF22240 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:30:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602779444; bh=UkrdZc47kC7Domj8uTDjSM10oqtJl1xRrFG4Y7ujeOg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=16o1MA5YXkRDJdcojgi7t6Mn6DEBfGfzUgywRl91jtsgUzWJ53HgXwpED3/PJlH7J iEzRpDLvp5skkoovdNsrhDEXQ/yDWMtaydUoBEqVf7XIvrYNYoPxm4TQo+w+0FDM5B 5VzTQ0qVY9JlFLlYMAo25KrJljqv4295/oeufVCk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389433AbgJOQan (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:30:43 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53578 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388357AbgJOQan (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:30:43 -0400 Received: from coco.lan (ip5f5ad5a1.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.90.213.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEBD522240; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:30:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602779442; bh=UkrdZc47kC7Domj8uTDjSM10oqtJl1xRrFG4Y7ujeOg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jAycibV+0HW/YJR1j1AXWHsG+t4V70W9RF+Z7A1yJfkw1n/jtHkkNELqJN/8RorIK 6RLAypqatDkt6B2V0lD81QpVQPH19DRUrRKSqtvSYnIl8IpAC/tY9jZDjauex+Za4v Iqn0/9Kl9fAYH2TQgN+TRGOIAnQYfaMBwhdy9zeE= Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:30:36 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/80] htmldoc build fixes with Sphinx 2.x and 3.x Message-ID: <20201015183036.1f3dca65@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:49:23 +0200 Daniel Vetter escreveu: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:53:15PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > This series actually folds the previous Sphinx 3.x patch series > > with the other patches I sent fixing warnings with Sphinx > > 2.x and with kernel-doc and that weren't merged yet via > > some other tree. > > > > It is based on the top of upstream, plus the media > > pull request I sent yesterday: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201012134139.0d58f5d7@coco.lan/ > > > > My plan is to send a pull request with those patches after Thursday's > > linux next release. > > > > On this series, I removed the patches that depend on material > > currently found only at linux-next. > > Was a bit tricky to find the cover letter here and that you plan to > send these out this merge window. Sorry for that. As this series touch lots of subsystems, just c/c the maintainers mean more than 50 c/c to patch 00. Some e-mail servers may not accept e-mails with too many c/c people. Yet, checking at the c/c list of the original patch, you were copied on patch 00/80. So, maybe the e-mail server had silently dropped the original e-mail. > I think we'll have some confusion > now with Alex from amd having picked up a few already. I ended moving (at least part of) the drm patches from this series into a second one, as I'm intending to submit most of those patches today or tomorrow, and the remaining ones by the end of the merge window. > Anyway Acked-by: Daniel Vetter for the > remaining drm patches. Thank you! > Although I can also pick them up to > drm-misc-next (but that's going to be 5.11 or so). It would be a way better to have them merged for 5.10, in order to have a clean html build there. Thanks, Mauro From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DE89C43457 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD2222240 for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jAycibV+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9DD2222240 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD51C6ED7D; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12A976ED7D for ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from coco.lan (ip5f5ad5a1.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.90.213.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEBD522240; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:30:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602779442; bh=UkrdZc47kC7Domj8uTDjSM10oqtJl1xRrFG4Y7ujeOg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jAycibV+0HW/YJR1j1AXWHsG+t4V70W9RF+Z7A1yJfkw1n/jtHkkNELqJN/8RorIK 6RLAypqatDkt6B2V0lD81QpVQPH19DRUrRKSqtvSYnIl8IpAC/tY9jZDjauex+Za4v Iqn0/9Kl9fAYH2TQgN+TRGOIAnQYfaMBwhdy9zeE= Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:30:36 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/80] htmldoc build fixes with Sphinx 2.x and 3.x Message-ID: <20201015183036.1f3dca65@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Direct Rendering Infrastructure - Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Linux Kernel Mailing List , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Linux Doc Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" Em Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:49:23 +0200 Daniel Vetter escreveu: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 01:53:15PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > This series actually folds the previous Sphinx 3.x patch series > > with the other patches I sent fixing warnings with Sphinx > > 2.x and with kernel-doc and that weren't merged yet via > > some other tree. > > > > It is based on the top of upstream, plus the media > > pull request I sent yesterday: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201012134139.0d58f5d7@coco.lan/ > > > > My plan is to send a pull request with those patches after Thursday's > > linux next release. > > > > On this series, I removed the patches that depend on material > > currently found only at linux-next. > > Was a bit tricky to find the cover letter here and that you plan to > send these out this merge window. Sorry for that. As this series touch lots of subsystems, just c/c the maintainers mean more than 50 c/c to patch 00. Some e-mail servers may not accept e-mails with too many c/c people. Yet, checking at the c/c list of the original patch, you were copied on patch 00/80. So, maybe the e-mail server had silently dropped the original e-mail. > I think we'll have some confusion > now with Alex from amd having picked up a few already. I ended moving (at least part of) the drm patches from this series into a second one, as I'm intending to submit most of those patches today or tomorrow, and the remaining ones by the end of the merge window. > Anyway Acked-by: Daniel Vetter for the > remaining drm patches. Thank you! > Although I can also pick them up to > drm-misc-next (but that's going to be 5.11 or so). It would be a way better to have them merged for 5.10, in order to have a clean html build there. Thanks, Mauro _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel