From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Han Xu <xhnjupt@gmail.com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: mxc: Move the ECC engine initialization to the right place
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 19:01:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201016190149.55a3d62f@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201016135351.GL13710@pengutronix.de>
Hi Sascha,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote on Fri, 16 Oct 2020
15:53:51 +0200:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 09:49:42AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > No ECC initialization should happen during the host controller probe.
> >
> > Indeed, we need the probe to call nand_scan() in order to:
> > - identify the device, its capabilities and constraints (nand_scan_ident())
> > - configure the ECC engine accordingly (->attach_chip())
> > - scan its content and prepare the core (nand_scan_tail())
> >
> > Moving these lines to mxcnd_attach_chip() fixes a regression caused by
> > a previous commit supposed to clarify these steps.
> >
> > Fixes: TODO
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Hi Han,
> >
> > Could you please give this patch a shot? It is supposed to fix
> > the LS1043A issue we have seen in robots reports the last weeks.
>
> With this there's no longer a division by zero in the kernel, but NAND
> now fails with the following. Also I can confirm that "mtd: rawnand:
> Use the ECC framework user input parsing bits" in next breaks it, without
> this patch the driver runs well.
>
> Sascha
>
> nand: device found, Manufacturer ID: 0x20, Chip ID: 0xa1
> nand: ST Micro NAND01GR3B2CZA6
> nand: 128 MiB, SLC, erase size: 128 KiB, page size: 2048, OOB size: 64
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mxc_nand.c:1390 mxc_nand_command+0xc4/0x26c
> Unimplemented command (cmd=0)
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.9.0-rc2-00020-g2e00450a5852 #20
> Hardware name: Freescale i.MX27 (Device Tree Support)
> [<c00106a4>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c000dd08>] (show_stack+0x10/0x18)
> [<c000dd08>] (show_stack) from [<c037950c>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x2c)
> [<c037950c>] (dump_stack) from [<c001c68c>] (__warn+0xb8/0xec)
> [<c001c68c>] (__warn) from [<c001ca54>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x90/0xbc)
> [<c001ca54>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c0494cb8>] (mxc_nand_command+0xc4/0x26c)
> [<c0494cb8>] (mxc_nand_command) from [<c0489f50>] (nand_read_page_op+0x28c/0x300)
> [<c0489f50>] (nand_read_page_op) from [<c048a0d4>] (nand_read_page_raw+0x2c/0x6c)
> [<c048a0d4>] (nand_read_page_raw) from [<c0486b68>] (nand_read_page_swecc+0x38/0x11c)
> [<c0486b68>] (nand_read_page_swecc) from [<c0487f5c>] (nand_read_oob+0x238/0x730)
Software ECC is used, is it expected?
Can you trace rawnand_dt_init() to see what happen in the engine_type
choice?
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-16 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-16 7:49 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: mxc: Move the ECC engine initialization to the right place Miquel Raynal
2020-10-16 11:32 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-10-16 11:45 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-10-16 12:05 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-10-16 12:11 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-10-16 13:53 ` Sascha Hauer
2020-10-16 17:01 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-10-16 17:37 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-10-16 19:18 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-10-16 21:05 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-10-16 21:32 ` Fabio Estevam
2020-10-17 18:17 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201016190149.55a3d62f@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=xhnjupt@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.