From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A46C433E7 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6E021D7F for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 15:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726928AbgJRPpG (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:45:06 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:33326 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726364AbgJRPpF (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2020 11:45:05 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kUArm-002JaU-NL; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:45:02 +0200 Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2020 17:45:02 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Daniel Thompson , Sumit Garg , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Masami Hiramatsu , steve@einval.com, Ilias Apalodimas , "open list:BPF JIT for MIPS (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Willy Liu , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Sasha Levin , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Masahisa Kojima Subject: Re: realtek PHY commit bbc4d71d63549 causes regression Message-ID: <20201018154502.GZ456889@lunn.ch> References: <20201017180453.GM456889@lunn.ch> <20201017182738.GN456889@lunn.ch> <20201017194904.GP456889@lunn.ch> <20201017230226.GV456889@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > However, that leaves the question why bbc4d71d63549bcd was backported, > although I understand why the discussion is a bit trickier there. But > if it did not fix a regression, only broken code that never worked in > the first place, I am not convinced it belongs in -stable. Please ask Serge Semin what platform he tested on. I kind of expect it worked for him, in some limited way, enough that it passed his testing. Andrew