From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v5.10
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:31:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019073143.GA3785787@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whE1rajA5Kzqey802zwv-82yrK5qc=nR3xRo5f38t-K8A@mail.gmail.com>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 7:14 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Please pull the latest core/rcu git tree from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git core-rcu-2020-10-12
>
> I've pulled everything but that last merge and the PREEMPT_COUNT
> stuff that came with it.
>
> When Paul asked whether it was ok for RCU to use preempt_count() and
> I answered in the affirmative, I didn't mean it in the sense of "RCU
> wants to force it on everybody else too".
>
> I'm pretty convinced that the proper fix is to simply make sure that
> rcu_free() and friends aren't run under any raw spinlocks. So even
> if the cost of preempt-count isn't that noticeable, there just isn't
> a reason for RCU to say "screw everybody else, I want this" when
> there are other alternatives.
That's certainly true - thanks for catching this & sorting it out from
the bigger pull request!
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-19 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-12 14:14 [GIT PULL] RCU changes for v5.10 Ingo Molnar
2020-10-12 20:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-12 21:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-12 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-12 23:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-13 0:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-13 2:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-13 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2020-10-13 9:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-18 21:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-19 3:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-19 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-10-19 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201019073143.GA3785787@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.