From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Ursulin, Tvrtko" <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>,
Maor Gottlieb <maorg@nvidia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com>,
Bob Pearson <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>, <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dynamic-sg patch has broken rdma_rxe
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 09:12:11 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019121211.GC6219@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9fa38ed1-605e-f0f6-6cb6-70b800a1831a@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:50:14AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > overshoot the max_segment if it is not a multiple of PAGE_SIZE. Simply fix
> > the alignment before starting and don't expose this implementation detail
> > to the callers.
>
> What does not make complete sense to me is the statement that input
> alignment requirement makes it impossible to connect to DMA layer, but then
> the patch goes to align behind the covers anyway.
>
> At minimum the kerneldoc should explain that max_segment will still be
> rounded down. But wouldn't it be better for the API to be more explicit and
> just require aligned anyway?
Why?
The API is to not produce sge's with a length longer than max_segment,
it isn't to produce sge's of exactly max_segment.
Everything else is an internal detail
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-19 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-13 14:33 dynamic-sg patch has broken rdma_rxe Bob Pearson
2020-10-13 16:34 ` Bob Pearson
2020-10-14 22:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-15 7:44 ` Maor Gottlieb
2020-10-15 11:23 ` Gal Pressman
2020-10-15 12:21 ` Maor Gottlieb
2020-10-16 0:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-16 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <796ca31aed8f469c957cb850385b9d09@intel.com>
2020-10-16 11:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-19 9:50 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-10-19 12:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2020-10-19 12:29 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-10-19 12:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 11:37 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-10-20 11:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 12:31 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-10-20 12:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-20 13:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-10-20 13:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-15 15:35 ` Bob Pearson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201019121211.GC6219@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=galpress@amazon.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maorg@nvidia.com \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.