All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Ewan D . Milne" <emilne@redhat.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: don't start concurrent async scan on same host
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 22:38:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201019143818.GA1427336@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff55dd89-f48c-2900-d967-8eb6b1e33289@acm.org>

On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 07:17:52AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/9/20 8:25 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Current scsi host scan mechanism supposes to fallback into sync host
> > scan if async scan is in-progress. However, this rule isn't strictly
> > respected, because scsi_prep_async_scan() doesn't hold scan_mutex when
> > checking shost->async_scan. When scsi_scan_host() is called
> > concurrently, two async scan on same host may be started, and hang in
> > do_scan_async() is observed.
> > 
> > Fixes this issue by checking & setting shost->async_scan atomically
> > with shost->scan_mutex.
> 
> Did you perhaps mean "by serializing shost->async_scan accesses with
> shost->scan_mutex"?

Specifically, the following checking & setting has to be done atomically,
so shost->scan_mutex is required, just as what scsi_finish_async_scan()
does for clearing shost->async_scan:

scsi_prep_async_scan():

	if (!shost->async_scan)
		return NULL;
	...
	shost->async_scan = 1

> 
> It is not clear to me why the shost->async_scan assignment is protected
> with the host lock. Can spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags) and
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(shost->host_lock, flags) be left out from this
> function?

I think it is doable to remove the ->host_lock from both scsi_prep_async_scan()
and scsi_finish_async_scan(), which can be done as one follow-up cleanup.

With this patch, all reading/writing shost->async_scan are protected by
shost->scan_mutex.

> 
> Anyway:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>

Thanks!


-- 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-19 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-10  3:25 [PATCH] scsi: core: don't start concurrent async scan on same host Ming Lei
2020-10-10 17:31 ` Lee Duncan
2020-10-17  6:23 ` Ming Lei
2020-10-19 14:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-10-19 14:38   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-10-26 20:08 ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201019143818.GA1427336@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=emilne@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.