From: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
bristot@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched_debug: remove the param dl_rq in print_dl_rq()
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 22:09:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201021140958.GA138139@rlk> (raw)
different from rt_sched_class and fair_sched_class,
dl_sched_class have no sched group.
We can direct get dl_rq according to cpu, so remove the
param dl_rq in print_dl_rq().
Signed-off-by: Hui Su <sh_def@163.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/debug.c | 3 ++-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 6d93f4518734..dd9bf5684df9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -2885,6 +2885,6 @@ bool dl_cpu_busy(unsigned int cpu)
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
void print_dl_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
{
- print_dl_rq(m, cpu, &cpu_rq(cpu)->dl);
+ print_dl_rq(m, cpu);
}
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
index 0655524700d2..2f0166828638 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
@@ -640,9 +640,10 @@ void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq)
#undef P
}
-void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct dl_rq *dl_rq)
+void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu)
{
struct dl_bw *dl_bw;
+ struct dl_rq *dl_rq = &cpu_rq(cpu)->dl;
SEQ_printf(m, "\n");
SEQ_printf(m, "dl_rq[%d]:\n", cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 28709f6b0975..e01c3391e386 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -2261,7 +2261,7 @@ extern void print_rt_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu);
extern void print_dl_stats(struct seq_file *m, int cpu);
extern void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
extern void print_rt_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct rt_rq *rt_rq);
-extern void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct dl_rq *dl_rq);
+extern void print_dl_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
extern void
show_numa_stats(struct task_struct *p, struct seq_file *m);
--
2.25.1
reply other threads:[~2020-10-21 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201021140958.GA138139@rlk \
--to=sh_def@163.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.