All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eryu Guan <guan@eryu.me>
To: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] generic: Add test to check for mounting a huge sparse dm device
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 00:24:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201101162427.GF3853@desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daec44e9f2e3ce483b7845065db3bf148ff5cd2c.1603864280.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com>

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 12:14:52PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani wrote:
> Add this test (which Christian Kujau reported) to check for regression
> caused due to ext4 bmap aops implementation was moved to use iomap APIs.
> jbd2 calls bmap() kernel function from fs/inode.c which was failing since
> iomap_bmap() implementation earlier returned 0 for block addr > INT_MAX.
> This regression was fixed with following kernel commit [1]
> commit b75dfde1212991b24b220c3995101c60a7b8ae74
> ("fibmap: Warn and return an error in case of block > INT_MAX")
> [1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1279914
> 
> w/o the kernel fix we get below error and mount fails
> 
> [ 1461.988701] run fstests generic/613 at 2020-10-27 19:57:34
> [ 1530.511978] jbd2_journal_init_inode: Cannot locate journal superblock
> [ 1530.513310] EXT4-fs (dm-1): Could not load journal inode
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  common/rc             | 10 +++++++
>  tests/generic/613     | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/generic/613.out |  3 ++
>  tests/generic/group   |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/generic/613
>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/613.out
> 
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 27a27ea36f75..b0c353c4c107 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -1607,6 +1607,16 @@ _require_scratch_size()
>  	[ $devsize -lt $1 ] && _notrun "scratch dev too small"
>  }
> 
> +# require a scratch dev of a minimum size (in kb) and should not be checked
> +# post test
> +_require_scratch_size_nocheck()
> +{
> +	[ $# -eq 1 ] || _fail "_require_scratch_size: expected size param"
> +
> +	_require_scratch_nocheck
> +	local devsize=`_get_device_size $SCRATCH_DEV`
> +	[ $devsize -lt $1 ] && _notrun "scratch dev too small"
> +}

Seems there's no need to introduce this new helper, just open-coded

# comments on why we use _nocheck here
_require_scratch_nocheck
_require_scratch_size $size

> 
>  # this test needs a test partition - check we're ok & mount it
>  #
> diff --git a/tests/generic/613 b/tests/generic/613
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..b426ef91cacf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/613
> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2020 Christian Kujau. All Rights Reserved.
> +# Copyright (c) 2020 Ritesh Harjani. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test generic/613
> +#
> +# Since the test is not specific to ext4, hence adding it to generic.
> +# Add this test to check for regression which was reported when ext4 bmap
> +# aops was moved to use iomap APIs. jbd2 calls bmap() kernel function
> +# from fs/inode.c which was failing since iomap_bmap() implementation earlier
> +# returned 0 for block addr > INT_MAX.
> +# This regression was fixed with following kernel commit [1]
> +# commit b75dfde1212991b24b220c3995101c60a7b8ae74
> +# ("fibmap: Warn and return an error in case of block > INT_MAX")
> +# [1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1279914
> +#
> +seq=`basename $0`
> +seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
> +echo "QA output created by $seq"
> +
> +here=`pwd`
> +tmp=/tmp/$$
> +status=1	# failure is the default!
> +trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	_dmhugedisk_cleanup
> +	cd /
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +# get standard environment, filters and checks
> +. ./common/rc
> +. ./common/filter
> +. ./common/dmhugedisk
> +
> +# remove previous $seqres.full before test
> +rm -f $seqres.full
> +
> +# Modify as appropriate.
> +_supported_fs generic
> +_require_dmhugedisk
> +_require_scratch_size_nocheck $((4 * 1024 * 1024)) #kB
> +
> +# For 1k bs with ext4, mkfs was failing maybe due to size limitation.

I think that's because only 4k blocksize ext4 supports filesystems
greater than 16T.

> +if [ "$FSTYP" = "ext4" ]; then
> +	export MKFS_OPTIONS="-F -b 4096"
> +fi

I'd check for fs block size after mkfs and _notrun if it's ext4 and
block_size < 4k. So we don't have to overwrite MKFS_OPTIONS and run the
test multiple times forcely in, for example ext4-1k config & ext4-4k
config.

Thanks,
Eryu

> +
> +# 17TB dm huge-test-zer0 device
> +# (in terms of 512 sectors)
> +sectors=$((2*1024*1024*1024*17))
> +chunk_size=128
> +
> +_dmhugedisk_init $sectors $chunk_size
> +_mkfs_dev $DMHUGEDISK_DEV
> +_mount $DMHUGEDISK_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT || _fail "mount failed for $DMHUGEDISK_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT"
> +testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/testfile-$seq
> +
> +$XFS_IO_PROG -fc "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 1m" -c "fsync" $testfile | _filter_xfs_io
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/613.out b/tests/generic/613.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4747b7596499
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/613.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> +QA output created by 613
> +wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0
> +XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
> diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group
> index 8054d874f005..360d145d2036 100644
> --- a/tests/generic/group
> +++ b/tests/generic/group
> @@ -615,3 +615,4 @@
>  610 auto quick prealloc zero
>  611 auto quick attr
>  612 auto quick clone
> +613 auto mount quick
> --
> 2.26.2

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-01 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-28  6:44 [PATCH 1/1] generic: Add test to check for mounting a huge sparse dm device Ritesh Harjani
2020-11-01 16:24 ` Eryu Guan [this message]
2020-12-04  3:57   ` Ritesh Harjani

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201101162427.GF3853@desktop \
    --to=guan@eryu.me \
    --cc=anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@nerdbynature.de \
    --cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.