All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>
Cc: "kbusch@kernel.org" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/5] nvmet: add passthru admin timeout value attr
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 08:32:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201105073246.GC4540@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR04MB49655CAAD9809FFC21D5418686EE0@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 12:24:41AM +0000, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> Are you saying that since it is a scaler we can get away without
> 
> locking ? If so I'll send V7 without locking in the configfs.
---end quoted text---

Yes.  Strictly speaking we should probably use WRITE_ONCE and READ_ONCE
for it these days to make the memory model happy, but it has always worked.

Btw, you mailer hasn't properly quoted replies for the past few weeks.

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-05  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-04 20:37 [PATCH V6 0/5] nvme-core: timeout related fixes and cleanup Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-11-04 20:37 ` [PATCH V6 1/5] nvme: centralize setting req timeout Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-11-04 22:10   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-11-05  7:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 20:37 ` [PATCH V6 2/5] nvmet: add passthru admin timeout value attr Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-11-04 22:13   ` Sagi Grimberg
     [not found]     ` <BYAPR04MB49655CAAD9809FFC21D5418686EE0@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2020-11-05  7:32       ` hch [this message]
2020-11-05  7:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-04 20:37 ` [PATCH V6 3/5] nvmet: add passthru io " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-11-04 22:13   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-11-04 20:37 ` [PATCH V6 4/5] nvme: use consistent macro name for timeout Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-11-04 22:14   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-11-04 20:37 ` [PATCH V6 5/5] nvme: centralize setting req end_io_data Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-11-04 22:17   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-11-05  7:28     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201105073246.GC4540@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.