From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [bug report] sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:46:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201113084657.GA86197@mwanda> (raw)
Hello Vincent Guittot,
The patch b4c9c9f15649: "sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric
wakeup path" from Oct 29, 2020, leads to the following static checker
warning:
kernel/sched/fair.c:6249 select_idle_sibling()
error: uninitialized symbol 'task_util'.
kernel/sched/fair.c
6233 static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
6234 {
6235 struct sched_domain *sd;
6236 unsigned long task_util;
6237 int i, recent_used_cpu;
6238
6239 /*
6240 * On asymmetric system, update task utilization because we will check
6241 * that the task fits with cpu's capacity.
6242 */
The original comment was a bit more clear... Perhaps "On asymmetric
system[s], [record the] task utilization because we will check that the
task [can be done within] the cpu's capacity."
6243 if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity)) {
6244 sync_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
6245 task_util = uclamp_task_util(p);
6246 }
"task_util" is not initialized on the else path.
6247
6248 if ((available_idle_cpu(target) || sched_idle_cpu(target)) &&
6249 asym_fits_capacity(task_util, target))
^^^^^^^^^
Uninitialized variable warning.
6250 return target;
6251
6252 /*
6253 * If the previous CPU is cache affine and idle, don't be stupid:
6254 */
6255 if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) &&
6256 (available_idle_cpu(prev) || sched_idle_cpu(prev)) &&
6257 asym_fits_capacity(task_util, prev))
6258 return prev;
6259
6260 /*
6261 * Allow a per-cpu kthread to stack with the wakee if the
regards,
dan carpenter
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-13 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-13 8:46 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-11-13 8:56 ` [bug report] sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path Vincent Guittot
2020-11-13 11:49 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201113084657.GA86197@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.