From: "Navare, Manasi" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Properly flag modesets for all bigjoiner pipes
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 14:55:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120225517.GA20005@labuser-Z97X-UD5H> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120160135.29702-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 06:01:35PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> If either of the bigjoiner pipes needs a modeset then we need
> a modeset on both pipes. Make it so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 40 ++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 595183f7b60f..321321230a55 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -15355,21 +15355,16 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_bigjoiner(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> -static int kill_bigjoiner_slave(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> - struct intel_crtc_state *master_crtc_state)
> +static void kill_bigjoiner_slave(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> + struct intel_crtc_state *master_crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc_state *slave_crtc_state =
> - intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(&state->base,
> - master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);
> -
> - if (IS_ERR(slave_crtc_state))
> - return PTR_ERR(slave_crtc_state);
> + intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);
Isnt this just a cleanup, doesnt relate to adding linked bigjoiner
pipe to the modeset.
Split this in a separate patch? Or atleast mention this in the commit message
Other than that looks good to me
Manasi
>
> slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner = master_crtc_state->bigjoiner = false;
> slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave = master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave = false;
> slave_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc = master_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc = NULL;
> intel_crtc_copy_uapi_to_hw_state(state, slave_crtc_state);
> - return 0;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -15507,7 +15502,7 @@ static int intel_atomic_check_async(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>
> static int intel_bigjoiner_add_affected_crtcs(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> - const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> + struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;
> int i;
>
> @@ -15521,6 +15516,16 @@ static int intel_bigjoiner_add_affected_crtcs(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);
> if (IS_ERR(linked_crtc_state))
> return PTR_ERR(linked_crtc_state);
> +
> + if (needs_modeset(crtc_state))
> + linked_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true;
> + }
> +
> + for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> + /* Kill old bigjoiner link, we may re-establish afterwards */
> + if (needs_modeset(crtc_state) &&
> + crtc_state->bigjoiner && !crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave)
> + kill_bigjoiner_slave(state, crtc_state);
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -15564,13 +15569,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> continue;
> }
>
> - /* Kill old bigjoiner link, we may re-establish afterwards */
> - if (old_crtc_state->bigjoiner && !old_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
> - ret = kill_bigjoiner_slave(state, new_crtc_state);
> - if (ret)
> - goto fail;
> - }
> -
> if (!new_crtc_state->uapi.enable) {
> if (!new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave) {
> intel_crtc_copy_uapi_to_hw_state(state, new_crtc_state);
> @@ -15640,6 +15638,16 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev,
> new_crtc_state->update_pipe = false;
> }
> }
> +
> + if (new_crtc_state->bigjoiner) {
> + struct intel_crtc_state *linked_crtc_state =
> + intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(state, new_crtc_state->bigjoiner_linked_crtc);
> +
> + if (needs_modeset(linked_crtc_state)) {
> + new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true;
> + new_crtc_state->update_pipe = false;
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
> --
> 2.26.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 16:01 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Properly flag modesets for all bigjoiner pipes Ville Syrjala
2020-11-20 17:52 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-11-20 18:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-11-20 22:23 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-11-20 22:55 ` Navare, Manasi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201120225517.GA20005@labuser-Z97X-UD5H \
--to=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.