From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8527884075569439686==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Sterba To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [kdave-btrfs-devel:misc-next 140/144] fs/btrfs/scrub.c:75:44: sparse: sparse: dubious one-bit signed bitfield Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 16:51:46 +0100 Message-ID: <20201123155146.GC8669@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <4539e453-6067-7aea-48f2-78d6e70b9fd0@suse.com> List-Id: --===============8527884075569439686== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 09:22:43AM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > a2de733c78fa7af Arne Jansen 2011-03-08 69 u64 generation; > > b5d67f64f9bc656 Stefan Behrens 2012-03-27 70 u64 logical; > > b5d67f64f9bc656 Stefan Behrens 2012-03-27 71 u64 physical; > > ff023aac31198e8 Stefan Behrens 2012-11-06 72 u64 physical_for_dev_= replace; > > 570193454a5841a Zhao Lei 2015-01-20 73 atomic_t refs; > > ec9799c7e151eb4 Qu Wenruo 2020-11-13 74 u8 mirror_num; > > ec9799c7e151eb4 Qu Wenruo 2020-11-13 @75 int have_csum:1; > > ec9799c7e151eb4 Qu Wenruo 2020-11-13 76 int io_error:1; > = > Do I need to resend the patch (to use unsigned int) or you can modify it > on your side? I've fixed in the local branch. --===============8527884075569439686==--