All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com,
	mreitz@redhat.com, kwolf@redhat.com, vsementsov@virtuozzo.com,
	den@openvz.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/21] tests/test-bdrv-graph-mod: add test_parallel_exclusive_write
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 23:12:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201123201233.9534-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123201233.9534-1-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

Add the test that shows that concept of ignore_children is incomplete.
Actually, when we want to update something, ignoring permission of some
existing BdrvChild, we should ignore also the propagated effect of this
child to the other children. But that's not done. Better approach
(update permissions on already updated graph) will be implemented
later.

No the test fails, so it's added with -d argument to not break make
check.

Test fails with

 "Conflicts with use by fl1 as 'backing', which does not allow 'write' on base"

because when updating permissions we can ignore original top->fl1
BdrvChild. But we don't ignore exclusive write permission in fl1->base
BdrvChild, which is propagated. Correct thing to do is make graph
change first and then do permission update from the top node.

To run test do

  ./test-bdrv-graph-mod -d -p /bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-exclusive-write

from <build-directory>/tests.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
 tests/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c b/tests/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
index 8cff13830e..3b9e6f242f 100644
--- a/tests/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
+++ b/tests/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
@@ -44,6 +44,21 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_no_perm = {
     .bdrv_child_perm = no_perm_default_perms,
 };
 
+static void exclusive_write_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
+                                  BdrvChildRole role,
+                                  BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue,
+                                  uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
+                                  uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
+{
+    *nperm = BLK_PERM_WRITE;
+    *nshared = BLK_PERM_ALL & ~BLK_PERM_WRITE;
+}
+
+static BlockDriver bdrv_exclusive_writer = {
+    .format_name = "exclusive-writer",
+    .bdrv_child_perm = exclusive_write_perms,
+};
+
 static BlockDriverState *no_perm_node(const char *name)
 {
     return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_no_perm, name, BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort);
@@ -55,6 +70,12 @@ static BlockDriverState *pass_through_node(const char *name)
                                 BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort);
 }
 
+static BlockDriverState *exclusive_writer_node(const char *name)
+{
+    return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_exclusive_writer, name,
+                                BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort);
+}
+
 /*
  * test_update_perm_tree
  *
@@ -185,8 +206,44 @@ static void test_should_update_child(void)
     blk_unref(root);
 }
 
+/*
+ * test_parallel_exclusive_write
+ *
+ * Check that when we replace node, old permissions of the node being removed
+ * doesn't break the replacement.
+ */
+static void test_parallel_exclusive_write(void)
+{
+    BlockDriverState *top = exclusive_writer_node("top");
+    BlockDriverState *base = no_perm_node("base");
+    BlockDriverState *fl1 = pass_through_node("fl1");
+    BlockDriverState *fl2 = pass_through_node("fl2");
+
+    bdrv_attach_child(top, fl1, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_DATA,
+                      &error_abort);
+    bdrv_attach_child(fl1, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED,
+                      &error_abort);
+    bdrv_attach_child(fl2, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED,
+                      &error_abort);
+    bdrv_ref(base);
+
+    bdrv_replace_node(fl1, fl2, &error_abort);
+
+    bdrv_unref(top);
+}
+
 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
+    int i;
+    bool debug = false;
+
+    for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
+        if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-d")) {
+            debug = true;
+            break;
+        }
+    }
+
     bdrv_init();
     qemu_init_main_loop(&error_abort);
 
@@ -196,5 +253,10 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
     g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/should-update-child",
                     test_should_update_child);
 
+    if (debug) {
+        g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-exclusive-write",
+                        test_parallel_exclusive_write);
+    }
+
     return g_test_run();
 }
-- 
2.21.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-23 20:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-23 20:12 [PATCH RFC 00/21] block: update graph permissions update Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: make bdrv_drop_intermediate() less wrong Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-24  9:39   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: assert that permission commit sets same permissions Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-24  9:40   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 02/21] tests/test-bdrv-graph-mod: add test_parallel_perm_update Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 03/21] util: add transactions.c Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 04/21] block: bdrv_refresh_perms: check parents compliance Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-24  9:42   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 05/21] block: refactor bdrv_child* permission functions Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 06/21] block: rewrite bdrv_child_try_set_perm() using bdrv_refresh_perms() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 07/21] block: inline bdrv_child_*() permission functions calls Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 08/21] block: use topological sort for permission update Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 09/21] block: add bdrv_drv_set_perm transaction action Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 10/21] block: add bdrv_list_* permission update functions Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 11/21] block: add bdrv_replace_child_safe() transaction action Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 12/21] block: return value from bdrv_replace_node() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 13/21] block: fix bdrv_replace_node_common Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 14/21] block: add bdrv_attach_child_noperm() transaction action Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 15/21] block: split out bdrv_replace_node_noperm() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 16/21] block: bdrv_append(): don't consume reference Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 17/21] block: bdrv_append(): return status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 18/21] block: adapt bdrv_append() for inserting filters Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 19/21] block: add bdrv_remove_backing transaction action Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 20/21] block: introduce bdrv_drop_filter() Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-11-23 20:12 ` [PATCH 21/21] block/backup-top: drop .active Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201123201233.9534-3-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=den@openvz.org \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.