From: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: VRF NS for lladdr sent on the wrong interface
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 19:23:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201124002345.GA42222@ubuntu> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5469 bytes --]
Hi,
I'm running into a problem with lladdr pinging all-host mcast all nodes
addr. The ping intially works but after cycling the interface that
receives the ping, the echo request packet causes a neigh solicitation
being sent on a different interface.
To repro, I included the attached namespace scripts. This is the
topology and an output of my test.
# +-------+ +----------+ +-------+
# | h0 | | r0 | | h1 |
# | v00+-----+v00 v01+---+v10 |
# | | | | | |
# +-------+ +----------+ +-------+
Setup and list of addresses:
$ sudo sh ./setup.sh
$ sudo ip netns exec h0 ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK> mtu 65536 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
28: h0_v00@if27: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether b2:72:0a:25:7d:0f brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netns r0
inet6 fe80::b072:aff:fe25:7d0f/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
$ sudo ip netns exec r0 ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK> mtu 65536 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
2: vrf_r0: <NOARP,MASTER,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 5a:48:08:1e:e6:38 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host vrf_r0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
27: r0_v00@if28: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vrf_r0 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether aa:9d:a5:cf:ab:75 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netns h0
inet6 fe80::a89d:a5ff:fecf:ab75/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
30: r0_v01@if29: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vrf_r0 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 52:0f:70:b5:a8:6a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netns h1
inet6 fe80::500f:70ff:feb5:a86a/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
$ sudo ip netns exec h1 ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK> mtu 65536 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
29: h1_v10@if30: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether aa:3c:c1:a0:07:7c brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netns r0
inet6 fe80::a83c:c1ff:fea0:77c/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
Initially ping is replied by r0_v00:
$ sudo ip netns exec h0 ping -c 1 ff02::1%h0_v00
PING ff02::1%h0_v00(ff02::1%h0_v00) 56 data bytes
64 bytes from fe80::a89d:a5ff:fecf:ab75%h0_v00: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=4.44 ms
--- ff02::1%h0_v00 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.443/4.443/4.443/0.000 ms
Cycle r0_v00. Ping isn't replied and the tcpdump shows that the NS for h0_v00 lladdr
is sent over r0_v01:
$ sudo ip netns exec r0 ip link set r0_v00 down
$ sudo ip netns exec r0 ip link set r0_v00 up
$ sudo ip netns exec r0 ip addr show dev r0_v00
27: r0_v00@if28: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master vrf_r0 state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether aa:9d:a5:cf:ab:75 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netns h0
inet6 fe80::a89d:a5ff:fecf:ab75/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
$ sudo ip netns exec h0 ping -c 1 ff02::1%h0_v00
PING ff02::1%h0_v00(ff02::1%h0_v00) 56 data bytes
--- ff02::1%h0_v00 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 0ms
$ sudo ip netns exec h1 tcpdump -i h1_v10
tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
listening on h1_v10, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
^C12:36:12.210524 IP6 fe80::a83c:c1ff:fea0:77c > ip6-allrouters: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 16
12:36:34.456650 IP6 fe80::500f:70ff:feb5:a86a > ff02::1:ff25:7d0f: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who has fe80::b072:aff:fe25:7d0f, length 32
12:36:35.474519 IP6 fe80::500f:70ff:feb5:a86a > ff02::1:ff25:7d0f: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who has fe80::b072:aff:fe25:7d0f, length 32
12:36:36.498455 IP6 fe80::500f:70ff:feb5:a86a > ff02::1:ff25:7d0f: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who has fe80::b072:aff:fe25:7d0f, length 32
4 packets captured
4 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
I'm thinking that the following patch is needed:
diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
index f2793ffde191..30f4e867fe5b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
@@ -1315,11 +1315,14 @@ static struct sk_buff *vrf_ip6_rcv(struct net_device *vrf_dev,
int orig_iif = skb->skb_iif;
bool need_strict = rt6_need_strict(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr);
bool is_ndisc = ipv6_ndisc_frame(skb);
+ bool is_ll_src;
/* loopback, multicast & non-ND link-local traffic; do not push through
* packet taps again. Reset pkt_type for upper layers to process skb
*/
- if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK || (need_strict && !is_ndisc)) {
+ is_ll_src = ipv6_addr_type(&ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL;
+ if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK ||
+ (need_strict && !is_ndisc && !is_ll_src)) {
skb->dev = vrf_dev;
skb->skb_iif = vrf_dev->ifindex;
IP6CB(skb)->flags |= IP6SKB_L3SLAVE;
But wanting to probe first to see if I could have missed something. Or
is there a better patch. I would be happy to follow up with a formal patch.
Thank you,
Stephen.
[-- Attachment #2: setup.sh --]
[-- Type: application/x-sh, Size: 915 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: teardown.sh --]
[-- Type: application/x-sh, Size: 184 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 0:23 Stephen Suryaputra [this message]
2020-11-24 20:43 ` VRF NS for lladdr sent on the wrong interface David Ahern
2020-11-24 20:57 ` Stephen Suryaputra
2020-11-25 15:10 ` Stephen Suryaputra
2020-12-01 1:15 ` David Ahern
2020-12-01 19:00 ` Stephen Suryaputra
2020-12-02 1:06 ` David Ahern
2020-12-03 13:01 ` Stephen Suryaputra
2020-12-03 15:53 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201124002345.GA42222@ubuntu \
--to=ssuryaextr@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.