All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com>,
	"virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org"
	<virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Ariel Elior <aelior@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH v9] virtio-net: Add support for the flexible driver notification structure.
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:19:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201124111907.4e6fea45.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123171642.2da4abfa.pasic@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 17:16:42 +0100
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 22:41:42 +0000
> Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com> wrote:
> 
> > When the driver is required to send an available buffer notification to the device, it sends the virtqueue number to be notified.
> > With this new feature, the device can optionally provide a per-virtqueue value for the driver to use in driver notifications, instead of the virtqueue number.
> > Some devices may benefit from this flexibility by providing, for example, an internal virtqueue identifier, or an internal offset related to the virtqueue number.
> > 
> > Changes from v8:
> >  * Incorporated comments for v8:
> >      - moved the feature from a network device to a global section
> >      - few minor changes
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Mireyno <vmireyno@marvell.com>
> > ---
> >  content.tex | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

> 
> Whith your patch applied on top of current master I get something like this
> 
> """
> \subsubsection{Available Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Available Buffer Notifications}
> 
> When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated,
> the driver sends an available buffer notification to the device by writing
> the 16-bit virtqueue index
> of this virtqueue to the Queue Notify address.
> 
> When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated,
> the driver sends an available buffer notification to the device by writing
> the following 32-bit value to the Queue Notify address:
> \lstinputlisting{notifications-le.c}
> 
> See \ref{sec:Virtqueues / Driver notifications}~\nameref{sec:Virtqueues / Driver notifications}
> for the definition of the components.
> 
> See \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Notification capability}
> for how to calculate the Queue Notify address.
> 
> \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Available Buffer Notifications}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Available Buffer Notifications}
> If VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA has been negotiated:
> \begin{itemize}
> \item If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, the driver MUST use the
> \field{queue_notify_data} value instead of the virtqueue index.
> \item If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated, the driver MUST set the
> \field{vqn} field to the \field{queue_notify_data} value.
> \end{itemize}
> 
> \subsubsection{Used Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Used Buffer Notifications}
> """
> 
> The device normative section and the preceding text are IMHO in
> contradiction. The former says  the driver sends a 16-bit virtqueue
> index unconditionally, the later says if if VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA
> has been negotiated then use queue_notify_data, instead (thus
> referencing the non-normative content).
> 

I'd probably reword the paragraph above to

"When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, the driver
sends an available buffer notification to the device by writing either
the 16-bit virtqueue index of this virtqueue or, if
VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA has been negotiated, the 16-bit queue
notification data to the Queue Notify address."

> IMHO we need a normative section that fully describes all the available
> cases.
> 
> I think we can do this on top.

Agreed.

> 
> Regards,
> Halil
> 
> This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
> OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
> 
> In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
> to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
> before posting.
> 
> Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
> List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
> Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
> List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
> Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
> Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
> 


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/


  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-24 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-05 22:41 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v9] virtio-net: Add support for the flexible driver notification structure Vitaly Mireyno
2020-11-19 15:57 ` [virtio-comment] " Vitaly Mireyno
2020-11-23 14:38   ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-11-23 18:02     ` Halil Pasic
2020-11-23 16:16 ` [virtio-comment] " Halil Pasic
2020-11-24 10:19   ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2020-12-07 14:06     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-12-07 14:57       ` [virtio-comment] RE: [EXT] " Vitaly Mireyno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201124111907.4e6fea45.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=aelior@marvell.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
    --cc=vmireyno@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.