From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.11] block: optimise for_each_bvec() advance
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:37:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201124113729.GA88892@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60aaa6caab3d061cf7194716c27a10920b5bd7ad.1606212786.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:21:23AM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> Because of how for_each_bvec() works it never advances across multiple
> entries at a time, so bvec_iter_advance() is an overkill. Add
> specialised bvec_iter_advance_single() that is faster. It also handles
> zero-len bvecs, so can kill bvec_iter_skip_zero_bvec().
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> before:
> 23977 805 0 24782 60ce lib/iov_iter.o
> before, bvec_iter_advance() w/o WARN_ONCE()
> 22886 600 0 23486 5bbe ./lib/iov_iter.o
> after:
> 21862 600 0 22462 57be lib/iov_iter.o
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bvec.h | 16 +++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bvec.h b/include/linux/bvec.h
> index 2efec10bf792..4a304dfafa18 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bvec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bvec.h
> @@ -121,18 +121,24 @@ static inline bool bvec_iter_advance(const struct bio_vec *bv,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static inline void bvec_iter_skip_zero_bvec(struct bvec_iter *iter)
> +static inline void bvec_iter_advance_single(const struct bio_vec *bv,
> + struct bvec_iter *iter, unsigned int bytes)
> {
> - iter->bi_bvec_done = 0;
> - iter->bi_idx++;
> + unsigned int done = iter->bi_bvec_done + bytes;
> +
> + if (done == bv[iter->bi_idx].bv_len) {
> + done = 0;
> + iter->bi_idx++;
> + }
> + iter->bi_bvec_done = done;
> + iter->bi_size -= bytes;
> }
>
> #define for_each_bvec(bvl, bio_vec, iter, start) \
> for (iter = (start); \
> (iter).bi_size && \
> ((bvl = bvec_iter_bvec((bio_vec), (iter))), 1); \
> - (bvl).bv_len ? (void)bvec_iter_advance((bio_vec), &(iter), \
> - (bvl).bv_len) : bvec_iter_skip_zero_bvec(&(iter)))
> + bvec_iter_advance_single((bio_vec), &(iter), (bvl).bv_len))
>
> /* for iterating one bio from start to end */
> #define BVEC_ITER_ALL_INIT (struct bvec_iter) \
> --
> 2.24.0
>
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 10:21 [PATCH 5.11] block: optimise for_each_bvec() advance Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-24 11:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-24 13:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-11-24 11:37 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-11-24 12:54 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201124113729.GA88892@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.