From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: kaixuxia <xiakaixu1987@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: show the proper user quota options
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 08:50:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201124165017.GG7880@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <762983f4-6803-2bae-3e21-e7f1dfa95991@gmail.com>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:37:07PM +0800, kaixuxia wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/11/24 8:30, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 05:38:52PM +0800, xiakaixu1987@gmail.com wrote:
> >> From: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
> >>
> >> The quota option 'usrquota' should be shown if both the XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT
> >> and XFS_UQUOTA_ENFD flags are set. The option 'uqnoenforce' should be
> >> shown when only the XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT flag is set. The current code logic
> >> seems wrong, Fix it and show proper options.
> >
> > This needs a regression test case to make sure that quota mount options
> > passed in ==> quota options in /proc/mounts, wouldn't you say? ;)
>
> Hi Darrick,
>
> The simple test case as follows:
>
> Before the patch:
> # mount -o uqnoenforce /dev/vdc1 /data1
> # cat /proc/mounts | grep xfs
> /dev/vdc1 /data1 xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=32k,usrquota 0 0
>
> After the patch:
> # mount -o uqnoenforce /dev/vdc1 /data1
> # cat /proc/mounts | grep xfs
> /dev/vdc1 /data1 xfs rw,relatime,attr2,inode64,logbufs=8,logbsize=32k,uqnoenforce 0 0
>
> I'm not sure if a xfstest case is needed:)
It's been broken for a decade and nobody noticed.
YES IT IS.
--D
>
> Thanks,
> Kaixu
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
> >> ---
> >> fs/xfs/xfs_super.c | 10 ++++++----
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> >> index e3e229e52512..5ebd6cdc44a7 100644
> >> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> >> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> >> @@ -199,10 +199,12 @@ xfs_fs_show_options(
> >> seq_printf(m, ",swidth=%d",
> >> (int)XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, mp->m_swidth));
> >>
> >> - if (mp->m_qflags & (XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT|XFS_UQUOTA_ENFD))
> >> - seq_puts(m, ",usrquota");
> >> - else if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT)
> >> - seq_puts(m, ",uqnoenforce");
> >> + if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_UQUOTA_ACCT) {
> >> + if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_UQUOTA_ENFD)
> >> + seq_puts(m, ",usrquota");
> >> + else
> >> + seq_puts(m, ",uqnoenforce");
> >> + }
> >>
> >> if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ACCT) {
> >> if (mp->m_qflags & XFS_PQUOTA_ENFD)
> >> --
> >> 2.20.0
> >>
>
> --
> kaixuxia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 9:38 [PATCH] xfs: show the proper user quota options xiakaixu1987
2020-11-23 18:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-11-24 1:26 ` Eric Sandeen
2020-11-24 0:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-11-24 8:37 ` kaixuxia
2020-11-24 16:50 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2020-12-06 23:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-07 3:13 ` kaixuxia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201124165017.GG7880@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=kaixuxia@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiakaixu1987@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.