From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Haitao Shi <shihaitao1@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangle6@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix some spelling mistakes in comments
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 10:06:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201127080605.GA557259@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201127011747.86005-1-shihaitao1@huawei.com>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 09:17:47AM +0800, Haitao Shi wrote:
> Fix some spelling mistakes in comments:
> udpate ==> update
> succesful ==> successful
> exmaple ==> example
> unneccessary ==> unnecessary
> stoping ==> stopping
> uknown ==> unknown
>
> Signed-off-by: Haitao Shi <shihaitao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 2 +-
> mm/huge_memory.c | 2 +-
> mm/khugepaged.c | 2 +-
> mm/memblock.c | 2 +-
> mm/migrate.c | 2 +-
> mm/page_ext.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 3ebbe64..8826c48 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1359,7 +1359,7 @@ static int __wait_on_page_locked_async(struct page *page,
> else
> ret = PageLocked(page);
> /*
> - * If we were succesful now, we know we're still on the
> + * If we were successful now, we know we're still on the
> * waitqueue as we're still under the lock. This means it's
> * safe to remove and return success, we know the callback
> * isn't going to trigger.
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index ec2bb93..0fea0c2 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2356,7 +2356,7 @@ static void __split_huge_page_tail(struct page *head, int tail,
> * Clone page flags before unfreezing refcount.
> *
> * After successful get_page_unless_zero() might follow flags change,
> - * for exmaple lock_page() which set PG_waiters.
> + * for example lock_page() which set PG_waiters.
> */
> page_tail->flags &= ~PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP;
> page_tail->flags |= (head->flags &
> diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c
> index 4e3dff1..d6f7ede 100644
> --- a/mm/khugepaged.c
> +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c
> @@ -1273,7 +1273,7 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
> * PTEs are armed with uffd write protection.
> * Here we can also mark the new huge pmd as
> * write protected if any of the small ones is
> - * marked but that could bring uknown
> + * marked but that could bring unknown
> * userfault messages that falls outside of
> * the registered range. So, just be simple.
> */
> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
> index b68ee86..086662a 100644
> --- a/mm/memblock.c
> +++ b/mm/memblock.c
> @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
> * @base: base address of the region
> * @size: size of the region
> * @set: set or clear the flag
> - * @flag: the flag to udpate
> + * @flag: the flag to update
> *
> * This function isolates region [@base, @base + @size), and sets/clears flag
> *
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 5795cb8..8a3580c 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -2548,7 +2548,7 @@ static bool migrate_vma_check_page(struct page *page)
> * will bump the page reference count. Sadly there is no way to
> * differentiate a regular pin from migration wait. Hence to
> * avoid 2 racing thread trying to migrate back to CPU to enter
> - * infinite loop (one stoping migration because the other is
> + * infinite loop (one stopping migration because the other is
> * waiting on pte migration entry). We always return true here.
> *
> * FIXME proper solution is to rework migration_entry_wait() so
> diff --git a/mm/page_ext.c b/mm/page_ext.c
> index a3616f7..cf931eb 100644
> --- a/mm/page_ext.c
> +++ b/mm/page_ext.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
> *
> * The need callback is used to decide whether extended memory allocation is
> * needed or not. Sometimes users want to deactivate some features in this
> - * boot and extra memory would be unneccessary. In this case, to avoid
> + * boot and extra memory would be unnecessary. In this case, to avoid
> * allocating huge chunk of memory, each clients represent their need of
> * extra memory through the need callback. If one of the need callbacks
> * returns true, it means that someone needs extra memory so that
> --
> 2.10.1
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-27 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-27 1:17 [PATCH] mm: fix some spelling mistakes in comments Haitao Shi
2020-11-27 8:06 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2020-11-27 19:29 ` Souptick Joarder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201127080605.GA557259@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shihaitao1@huawei.com \
--cc=wangle6@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.