From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>, Sam Xi <xyzsam@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf stat: Use proper cpu for shadow stats
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 14:32:26 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201127173226.GO70905@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201127041404.390276-1-namhyung@kernel.org>
Em Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 01:14:03PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Currently perf stat shows some metrics (like IPC) for defined events.
> But when no aggregation mode is used (-A option), it shows incorrect
> values since it used a value from a different cpu.
>
> Before:
>
> $ perf stat -aA -e cycles,instructions sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
> CPU0 116,057,380 cycles
> CPU1 86,084,722 cycles
> CPU2 99,423,125 cycles
> CPU3 98,272,994 cycles
> CPU0 53,369,217 instructions # 0.46 insn per cycle
> CPU1 33,378,058 instructions # 0.29 insn per cycle
> CPU2 58,150,086 instructions # 0.50 insn per cycle
> CPU3 40,029,703 instructions # 0.34 insn per cycle
>
> 1.001816971 seconds time elapsed
>
> So the IPC for CPU1 should be 0.38 (= 33,378,058 / 86,084,722)
> but it was 0.29 (= 33,378,058 / 116,057,380) and so on.
>
> After:
>
> $ perf stat -aA -e cycles,instructions sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
> CPU0 109,621,384 cycles
> CPU1 159,026,454 cycles
> CPU2 99,460,366 cycles
> CPU3 124,144,142 cycles
> CPU0 44,396,706 instructions # 0.41 insn per cycle
> CPU1 120,195,425 instructions # 0.76 insn per cycle
> CPU2 44,763,978 instructions # 0.45 insn per cycle
> CPU3 69,049,079 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
>
> 1.001910444 seconds time elapsed
Thanks, applied, the new 'perf test' entry in 2/2 will be merged into
perf/core, as it isn't purely a fix,
- Arnaldo
> Reported-by: Sam Xi <xyzsam@google.com>
> Fixes: 44d49a600259 ("perf stat: Support metrics in --per-core/socket mode")
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/stat-display.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> index 4b57c0c07632..a963b5b8eb72 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
> @@ -324,13 +324,10 @@ static int first_shadow_cpu(struct perf_stat_config *config,
> struct evlist *evlist = evsel->evlist;
> int i;
>
> - if (!config->aggr_get_id)
> - return 0;
> -
> if (config->aggr_mode == AGGR_NONE)
> return id;
>
> - if (config->aggr_mode == AGGR_GLOBAL)
> + if (!config->aggr_get_id)
> return 0;
>
> for (i = 0; i < evsel__nr_cpus(evsel); i++) {
> --
> 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
>
--
- Arnaldo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-27 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-27 4:14 [PATCH v2 1/2] perf stat: Use proper cpu for shadow stats Namhyung Kim
2020-11-27 4:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf test: Add shadow stat test Namhyung Kim
2020-11-30 11:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-11-27 17:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201127173226.GO70905@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xyzsam@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.