From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: virt-ci-maint-team@redhat.com,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" <wainersm@redhat.com>,
"Willian Rampazzo" <wrampazz@redhat.com>,
"Cleber Rosa" <crosa@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-for-5.2] gitlab-ci: Do not automatically run Avocado integration tests anymore
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 10:31:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130103109.GD2039965@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9157dce0-4f5d-3f1e-ce75-3e9da9252203@redhat.com>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 07:29:31PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 27/11/2020 18.57, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 11/27/20 6:47 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> >> On 27/11/2020 18.41, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >>> We lately realized that the Avocado framework was not designed
> >>> to be regularly run on CI environments. Therefore, as of 5.2
> >>> we deprecate the gitlab-ci jobs using Avocado. To not disrupt
> >>> current users, it is possible to keep the current behavior by
> >>> setting the QEMU_CI_INTEGRATION_JOBS_PRE_5_2_RELEASE variable
> >>> (see [*]).
> >>> From now on, using these jobs (or adding new tests to them)
> >>> is strongly discouraged.
> >>>
> >>> Tests based on Avocado will be ported to new job schemes during
> >>> the next releases, with better documentation and templates.
> >>
> >> Why should we disable the jobs by default as long as there is no replacement
> >> available yet?
> >
> > Why keep it enabled if it is failing randomly
>
> We can still disable single jobs if they are not stable, but that's no
> reason to disable all of them by default, is it?
Agreed, the jobs which are known to be broken or unreliable should
be unconditonally disabled in QEMU as a whole. This isn't specific
to gitlab config - the qemu build makefiles/mesonfiles should disable
the problem tests entirely, as we don't want developers wasting time
running them locally either if they're known to be broken/unreliable.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-27 17:41 [RFC PATCH-for-5.2] gitlab-ci: Do not automatically run Avocado integration tests anymore Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-27 17:47 ` Thomas Huth
2020-11-27 17:57 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-27 18:29 ` Thomas Huth
2020-11-27 18:46 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-30 8:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-30 9:36 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-30 10:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-11-30 9:03 ` Thomas Huth
2020-11-30 9:52 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-11-30 10:25 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-11-30 10:31 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2020-11-30 16:45 ` Ademar Reis
2020-12-04 14:42 ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2020-11-27 23:21 ` Niek Linnenbank
2020-11-27 19:36 ` Wainer dos Santos Moschetta
2020-11-30 21:42 ` Willian Rampazzo
2020-12-01 3:48 ` Cleber Rosa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130103109.GD2039965@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=crosa@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=virt-ci-maint-team@redhat.com \
--cc=wainersm@redhat.com \
--cc=wrampazz@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.