From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq offset incrementation
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 12:23:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201201112338.GA72897@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201201092011.GS2414@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:20:11AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:12:25AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +static s64 irqtime_get_delta(struct irqtime *irqtime)
> > {
> > + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > s64 delta;
> >
> > delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - irqtime->irq_start_time;
> > irqtime->irq_start_time += delta;
> >
> > + return delta;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Called after incrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_enter */
> > +void irqtime_account_enter(struct task_struct *curr)
> > +{
> > + struct irqtime *irqtime = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_irqtime);
> > + u64 delta;
> > +
> > + if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + delta = irqtime_get_delta(irqtime);
> > + /*
> > + * We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
> > + * We want to continue accounting softirq time to ksoftirqd thread
> > + * in that case, so as not to confuse scheduler with a special task
> > + * that do not consume any time, but still wants to run.
> > + */
> > + if ((irq_count() == (SOFTIRQ_OFFSET | HARDIRQ_OFFSET)) &&
> > + curr != this_cpu_ksoftirqd())
> > + irqtime_account_delta(irqtime, delta, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Called before decrementing preempt_count on {soft,}irq_exit */
> > +void irqtime_account_exit(struct task_struct *curr)
> > +{
> > + struct irqtime *irqtime = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_irqtime);
> > + u64 delta;
> > +
> > + if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + delta = irqtime_get_delta(irqtime);
> > /*
> > * We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
> > * We want to continue accounting softirq time to ksoftirqd thread
>
>
> Urgh...
>
>
> Why not something like:
>
> void irqtime_account_irq(struct task_struct *curr, unsigned int offset)
> {
> struct irqtime *irqtime = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_irqtime);
> unsigned int pc = preempt_count() - offset;
> s64 delta;
> int cpu;
>
> if (!sched_clock_irqtime)
> return;
>
> cpu = smp_processor_id();
> delta = sched_clock_cpu(cpu) - irqtime->irq_start_time;
> irqtime->irq_start_time += delta;
>
> /*
> * We do not account for softirq time from ksoftirqd here.
> * We want to continue accounting softirq time to ksoftirqd thread
> * in that case, so as not to confuse scheduler with a special task
> * that do not consume any time, but still wants to run.
> */
> if (pc & HARDIRQ_MASK)
> irqtime_account_delta(irqtime, delta, CPUTIME_IRQ);
> else if ((pc & SOFTIRQ_OFFSET) && curr != this_cpu_ksoftirqd())
> irqtime_account_delta(irqtime, delta, CPUTIME_SOFTIRQ);
> }
>
>
Right that's better, I'll do that.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 0:12 [PATCH 0/5] irq: Reorder time handling against HARDIRQ_OFFSET on IRQ entry v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01 0:12 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/cputime: Remove symbol exports from IRQ time accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01 0:12 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/vtime: Consolidate " Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01 0:12 ` [PATCH 3/5] s390/vtime: Convert to consolidated " Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01 0:12 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq offset incrementation Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 11:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2020-12-01 11:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 11:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01 13:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 14:35 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-01 15:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 15:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 0:12 ` [PATCH 5/5] irq: Call tick_irq_enter() inside HARDIRQ_OFFSET Frederic Weisbecker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-12-02 11:57 [PATCH 0/5] irq: Reorder time handling against HARDIRQ_OFFSET on IRQ entry v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 11:57 ` [PATCH 4/5] irqtime: Move irqtime entry accounting after irq offset incrementation Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-02 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-28 2:15 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-29 13:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-29 14:12 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-29 14:30 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-29 15:58 ` Qais Yousef
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201201112338.GA72897@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.