From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6EEC64E8A for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCE9C221FE for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:05:44 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CCE9C221FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:46488 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQtD-00039W-7s for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:05:43 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56694) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQqw-00023G-4v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:03:24 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:30829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkQqt-0007JT-JK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:03:21 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606910598; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=6EZc0djMGgfL5xQnieZxBclw3C0SEGuDGBRz7Q8PJp8=; b=J68zPFKBT17aGO/XGZECv5kvZyWYuGvwI6Ij3P4kwn0RJxQMbA6ifK5Lia4jMbAPrdGVYt wSCnqLPKkXew5zneIDds6tY/Mh0r07W0rlEAMytSpM2/OkkpW52dZlUOSitL2E6xY96IIb 2ZVqgsUamQet7KUFzhGNuxgZob2I35o= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-517-WD-ddeVBOyitB0pIoDEaPA-1; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 07:03:16 -0500 X-MC-Unique: WD-ddeVBOyitB0pIoDEaPA-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE5BC64158; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (ovpn-115-57.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.115.57]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC41960C0F; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:03:06 +0000 From: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= To: Gerd Hoffmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/23] tests/docker: use project specific container registries Message-ID: <20201202120306.GG2360260@redhat.com> References: <20201201171825.2243775-1-berrange@redhat.com> <20201201171825.2243775-4-berrange@redhat.com> <20201202115414.uqergukvhsftofwc@sirius.home.kraxel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201202115414.uqergukvhsftofwc@sirius.home.kraxel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=berrange@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=berrange@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.497, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= Cc: Fam Zheng , Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 12:54:14PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > --- a/tests/docker/dockerfiles/centos8.docker > > +++ b/tests/docker/dockerfiles/centos8.docker > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > > -FROM centos:8.1.1911 > > +FROM registry.centos.org/centos:8 > > At least for centos-8 I've noticed the docker.io containters are > multiarch whereas registry.centos.org has x86_64 only. > > I think right now we don't use any !x86_64 containers due to gitlab > having only x86_64 shared runners. So this isn't a blocker. Wanted > to note that nevertheless ;) Interesting, I wonder if that's a mistake or not, because the Fedora / CentOS specific registries are supposed to be preferred, so I would have expected better content. In any case, for non-x86_64 stuff we currently do have all the Debian cross-compiler containers available. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|