Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sfp: add debugfs support

[Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>]

Jakub,

What's your opinion on this patch? It seems to have stalled...

Regards,
Russell

On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:46:40PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 09:49:16AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 10:41:51AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 01:14:31AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:06:16PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > > > Add debugfs support to SFP so that the internal state of the SFP state
> > > > > machines and hardware signal state can be viewed from userspace, rather
> > > > > than having to compile a debug kernel to view state state transitions
> > > > > in the kernel log.  The 'state' output looks like:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Module state: empty
> > > > > Module probe attempts: 0 0
> > > > > Device state: up
> > > > > Main state: down
> > > > > Fault recovery remaining retries: 5
> > > > > PHY probe remaining retries: 12
> > > > > moddef0: 0
> > > > > rx_los: 1
> > > > > tx_fault: 1
> > > > > tx_disable: 1
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Russell
> > > > 
> > > > This looks useful. I always seem to end up recompiling the kernel,
> > > > which as you said, this should avoid.
> > > 
> > > FWIW, another option is to use drgn [1]. Especially when the state is
> > > queried from the kernel and not hardware. We are using that in mlxsw
> > > [2][3].
> > 
> > Presumably that requires /proc/kcore support, which 32-bit ARM doesn't
> > have.
> 
> Yes, it does seem to be required for live debugging. I mostly work with
> x86 systems, I guess it's completely different for Andrew and you.
> 

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!