From: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:32:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201203183204.63759-7-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201203183204.63759-1-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
[ Upstream commit 0afa5ca82212247456f9de1468b595a111fee633 ]
I about to need and use the same functionality for pid based
inodes and there is no point in adding a second field when
this field is already here and serving the same purporse.
Just give the field a generic name so it is clear that
it is no longer sysctl specific.
Also for good measure initialize sibling_inodes when
proc_inode is initialized.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.9.x
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
---
fs/proc/inode.c | 1 +
fs/proc/internal.h | 2 +-
fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c
index a289349..14d9c1d 100644
--- a/fs/proc/inode.c
+++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
ei->pde = NULL;
ei->sysctl = NULL;
ei->sysctl_entry = NULL;
+ INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ei->sibling_inodes);
ei->ns_ops = NULL;
inode = &ei->vfs_inode;
return inode;
diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h
index 103435f..409b5c5 100644
--- a/fs/proc/internal.h
+++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct proc_inode {
struct proc_dir_entry *pde;
struct ctl_table_header *sysctl;
struct ctl_table *sysctl_entry;
- struct hlist_node sysctl_inodes;
+ struct hlist_node sibling_inodes;
const struct proc_ns_operations *ns_ops;
struct inode vfs_inode;
};
diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
index 191573a..671490e 100644
--- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
+++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c
@@ -272,9 +272,9 @@ static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head)
node = hlist_first_rcu(&head->inodes);
if (!node)
break;
- ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sysctl_inodes);
+ ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sibling_inodes);
spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
- hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes);
spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
inode = &ei->vfs_inode;
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_sys_make_inode(struct super_block *sb,
}
ei->sysctl = head;
ei->sysctl_entry = table;
- hlist_add_head_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes, &head->inodes);
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes, &head->inodes);
head->count++;
spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_sys_make_inode(struct super_block *sb,
void proc_sys_evict_inode(struct inode *inode, struct ctl_table_header *head)
{
spin_lock(&sysctl_lock);
- hlist_del_init_rcu(&PROC_I(inode)->sysctl_inodes);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&PROC_I(inode)->sibling_inodes);
if (!--head->count)
kfree_rcu(head, rcu);
spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-03 18:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-03 18:31 [PATCH 00/10] Cover letter: fix a race in release_task when flushing the dentry Wen Yang
2020-12-03 18:31 ` [PATCH 01/10] clone: add CLONE_PIDFD Wen Yang
2021-01-04 13:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-04 13:13 ` Christian Brauner
2021-01-04 13:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-04 13:19 ` Christian Brauner
2020-12-03 18:31 ` [PATCH 02/10] pidfd: add polling support Wen Yang
2020-12-03 18:31 ` [PATCH 03/10] proc: Pass file mode to proc_pid_make_inode Wen Yang
2020-12-03 18:31 ` [PATCH 04/10] proc: Better ownership of files for non-dumpable tasks in user namespaces Wen Yang
2020-12-03 18:31 ` [PATCH 05/10] proc: use %u for pid printing and slightly less stack Wen Yang
2020-12-03 20:08 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2020-12-03 18:32 ` Wen Yang [this message]
2020-12-03 18:32 ` [PATCH 07/10] proc: Generalize proc_sys_prune_dcache into proc_prune_siblings_dcache Wen Yang
2020-12-03 18:32 ` [PATCH 08/10] proc: Clear the pieces of proc_inode that proc_evict_inode cares about Wen Yang
2020-12-03 18:32 ` [PATCH 09/10] proc: Use d_invalidate in proc_prune_siblings_dcache Wen Yang
2020-12-03 18:32 ` [PATCH 10/10] proc: Use a list of inodes to flush from proc Wen Yang
2020-12-17 2:26 ` [PATCH 00/10] Cover letter: fix a race in release_task when flushing the dentry Wen Yang
2020-12-31 9:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-04 4:15 ` Wen Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201203183204.63759-7-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=wenyang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xlpang@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.