All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com" 
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/2] perf: support build BPF skeletons with perf
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2020 23:20:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201203222057.GD3613628@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <709375F7-A386-415B-926E-0A19783D09A5@fb.com>

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 10:47:59PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:

SNIP

> >> # As per kernel Makefile, avoid funny character set dependencies
> >> unexport LC_ALL
> >> @@ -735,7 +737,8 @@ prepare: $(OUTPUT)PERF-VERSION-FILE $(OUTPUT)common-cmds.h archheaders $(drm_ioc
> >> 	$(x86_arch_prctl_code_array) \
> >> 	$(rename_flags_array) \
> >> 	$(arch_errno_name_array) \
> >> -	$(sync_file_range_arrays)
> >> +	$(sync_file_range_arrays) \
> >> +	bpf-skel
> > 
> > I think the 'prepare' target is misused already with other stuff,
> > there's generated bpf_counter.c dependency on util/bpf_skel/bpf_prog_profiler.skel.h
> > in util/.bpf_counter.o.cmd, that should triger the build no?
> 
> This doesn't work for me. Once bpf-skel is removed from "prepare", we hit
> compilation error before util/.bpf_counter.o.cmd is generated. 

ok, I'll check on that with your new version

SNIP

> >> +submake_extras := feature_display=0
> >> +
> >> +$(SKEL_TMP_OUT):
> >> +	$(Q)$(MKDIR) -p $@
> >> +
> >> +$(BPFTOOL): | $(SKEL_TMP_OUT)
> >> +	CFLAGS= $(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C ../bpf/bpftool \
> >> +		OUTPUT=$(SKEL_TMP_OUT)/ bootstrap
> >> +
> >> +$(SKEL_TMP_OUT)/%.bpf.o: util/bpf_skel/%.bpf.c $(BPFOBJ) | $(SKEL_TMP_OUT)
> >> +	$(call QUIET_CLANG, $@)
> >> +	$(Q)$(CLANG) -g -O2 -target bpf	-c $(filter util/bpf_skel/%.bpf.c,$^) -o $@ && \
> >> +	$(LLVM_STRIP) -g $@
> >> +
> >> +$(SKEL_OUT)/%.skel.h: $(SKEL_TMP_OUT)/%.bpf.o | $(BPFTOOL)
> >> +	$(call QUIET_GENSKEL, $@)
> > 
> > is there a reason to use call in here? you could define QUIET_GENSKEL
> > to use $@ and use it the same way as we use the rest of QUIET_* stuf
> > in Makefile.perf
> 
> I am not following here. $(CALL QUIET_xx) was used for QUIET_CLEAN and 
> QUIET_INSTALL in Makefile.perf. What is the preferred pattern here?

right it's QUIET_CLEAN and QUIET_INSTALL because they need argument,
QUIET_GENSKEL uses $@, which is used directly in other QUIET_* macros

> 
> > 
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000000000..5263e9e6c5d83
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/.gitignore
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> >> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >> +.tmp
> >> +*.skel.h
> >> \ No newline at end of file
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/dummy.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/dummy.bpf.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000000000..492a43a851deb
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/dummy.bpf.c
> > 
> > hum, what's the reason for dummy skeleton? it just adds
> > time to compilation no?
> 
> It is mostly to test 1/2 of the set works fine. I guess we can remove 
> it in 2/2?

so it needs to be there otherwise the compilation fails?

I'll check your new version

thanks,
jirka


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-03 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-01  7:36 [RFC v2 0/2] Introduce perf-stat -b for BPF programs Song Liu
2020-12-01  7:36 ` [RFC v2 1/2] perf: support build BPF skeletons with perf Song Liu
2020-12-01 20:54   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-12-01 22:47     ` Song Liu
2020-12-03 22:20       ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-12-01  7:36 ` [RFC v2 2/2] perf-stat: enable counting events for BPF programs Song Liu
2020-12-01 20:16 ` [RFC v2 0/2] Introduce perf-stat -b " Jiri Olsa
2020-12-01 20:43   ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201203222057.GD3613628@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.