From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v5 00/15] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:28:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201208132835.6151-1-will@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi all,
Christmas has come early: it's time for version five of these patches
which have previously appeared here:
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201027215118.27003-1-will@kernel.org
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109213023.15092-1-will@kernel.org
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113093720.21106-1-will@kernel.org
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201124155039.13804-1-will@kernel.org
and which started life as a reimplementation of some patches from Qais:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201021104611.2744565-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
There's also now a nice writeup on LWN:
https://lwn.net/Articles/838339/
and rumours of a feature film are doing the rounds.
[subscriber-only, but if you're reading this then you should really
subscribe.]
The aim of this series is to allow 32-bit ARM applications to run on
arm64 SoCs where not all of the CPUs support the 32-bit instruction set.
Unfortunately, such SoCs are real and will continue to be productised
over the next few years at least. I can assure you that I'm not just
doing this for fun.
Changes in v5 include:
* Teach cpuset_cpus_allowed() about task_cpu_possible_mask() so that
we can avoid returning incompatible CPUs for a given task. This
means that sched_setaffinity() can be used with larger masks (like
the online mask) from userspace and also allows us to take into
account the cpuset hierarchy when forcefully overriding the affinity
for a task on execve().
* Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() when attaching a task to a cpuset,
so that the resulting affinity mask does not contain any incompatible
CPUs (since it would be rejected by set_cpus_allowed_ptr() otherwise).
* Moved overriding of the affinity mask into the scheduler core rather
than munge affinity masks directly in the architecture backend.
* Extended comments and documentation.
* Some renaming and cosmetic changes.
I'm pretty happy with this now, although it still needs review and will
require rebasing to play nicely with the SCA changes in -next.
Cheers,
Will
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
--->8
Will Deacon (15):
arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct
arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched EL0 support
arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq
selection
cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1
cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus()
sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask()
sched: Introduce force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() to limit CPU
affinity
arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask()
arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit
EL0
arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched
system
arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0
arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 9 +
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h | 44 ++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 3 +-
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 8 +-
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 13 ++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 219 ++++++++++++++----
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 53 +++--
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 19 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 11 +-
include/linux/cpuset.h | 3 +-
include/linux/mmu_context.h | 8 +
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 39 ++--
kernel/sched/core.c | 112 +++++++--
15 files changed, 426 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
kernel-team@android.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 00/15] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:28:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201208132835.6151-1-will@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi all,
Christmas has come early: it's time for version five of these patches
which have previously appeared here:
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201027215118.27003-1-will@kernel.org
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109213023.15092-1-will@kernel.org
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201113093720.21106-1-will@kernel.org
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201124155039.13804-1-will@kernel.org
and which started life as a reimplementation of some patches from Qais:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201021104611.2744565-1-qais.yousef@arm.com
There's also now a nice writeup on LWN:
https://lwn.net/Articles/838339/
and rumours of a feature film are doing the rounds.
[subscriber-only, but if you're reading this then you should really
subscribe.]
The aim of this series is to allow 32-bit ARM applications to run on
arm64 SoCs where not all of the CPUs support the 32-bit instruction set.
Unfortunately, such SoCs are real and will continue to be productised
over the next few years at least. I can assure you that I'm not just
doing this for fun.
Changes in v5 include:
* Teach cpuset_cpus_allowed() about task_cpu_possible_mask() so that
we can avoid returning incompatible CPUs for a given task. This
means that sched_setaffinity() can be used with larger masks (like
the online mask) from userspace and also allows us to take into
account the cpuset hierarchy when forcefully overriding the affinity
for a task on execve().
* Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() when attaching a task to a cpuset,
so that the resulting affinity mask does not contain any incompatible
CPUs (since it would be rejected by set_cpus_allowed_ptr() otherwise).
* Moved overriding of the affinity mask into the scheduler core rather
than munge affinity masks directly in the architecture backend.
* Extended comments and documentation.
* Some renaming and cosmetic changes.
I'm pretty happy with this now, although it still needs review and will
require rebasing to play nicely with the SCA changes in -next.
Cheers,
Will
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
--->8
Will Deacon (15):
arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct
arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support
KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched EL0 support
arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs
arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs
sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq
selection
cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1
cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus()
sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask()
sched: Introduce force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() to limit CPU
affinity
arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask()
arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit
EL0
arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched
system
arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0
arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores
.../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 9 +
.../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpu.h | 44 ++--
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 3 +-
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 8 +-
arch/arm64/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 13 ++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 219 ++++++++++++++----
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 53 +++--
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 19 +-
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 11 +-
include/linux/cpuset.h | 3 +-
include/linux/mmu_context.h | 8 +
include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 39 ++--
kernel/sched/core.c | 112 +++++++--
15 files changed, 426 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2.576.ga3fc446d84-goog
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-08 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-08 13:28 Will Deacon [this message]
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 00/15] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] arm64: cpuinfo: Split AArch32 registers out into a separate struct Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] arm64: Allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 support Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] KVM: arm64: Kill 32-bit vCPUs on systems with mismatched " Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] arm64: Kill 32-bit applications scheduled on 64-bit-only CPUs Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-17 12:15 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-17 12:15 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-17 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-17 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-17 14:59 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-17 14:59 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-17 15:00 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-17 15:00 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-28 3:54 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2020-12-28 3:54 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] sched: Introduce force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() to limit CPU affinity Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-28 4:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2020-12-28 4:29 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon
2020-12-08 13:28 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-15 17:36 ` [PATCH v5 00/15] An alternative series for asymmetric AArch32 systems Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 17:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 18:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-15 18:50 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-17 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-17 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-16 11:16 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-16 11:16 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-16 14:14 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-16 14:14 ` Will Deacon
2020-12-16 16:48 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-16 16:48 ` Qais Yousef
2020-12-16 18:21 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2020-12-16 18:21 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201208132835.6151-1-will@kernel.org \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.