All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 1/1] PCI: pciehp: Add support for handling MRL events
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 21:57:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201210205719.GA25769@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201203225124.GA72369@otc-nc-03>

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 02:51:24PM -0800, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> - Press ATTN, 
> - Slot is empty
> - After 5 seconds synthetic PDC arrives.
>   but since no presence and no link active, we leave slot in 
>   BLINKINGON_STATE, and led keeps blinking
> 
> if someone were to add a card after the 5 seconds, no hot-add is processed
> since we don't get notifications for PDC events when ATTN exists.
> 
> Can we automatically cancel the blinking and return slot back to OFF_STATE?

Yes.


> If the operation initiated by the attention button fails for any reason, it
> is recommended that system software present an error message explaining
> failure via a software user interface, or add the error message to system
> log.

Ah so we're supposed to log a message if the slot is empty.
That needs to be added then to the code snippet I sent you
yesterday in response to your off-list e-mail.


> Alternately we can also choose to subscribe to PDC, but ignore if slot is
> in OFF_STATE. So we let ATTN drive the add. But if PDC happens and we are
> in BLINKINGON_STATE, then we can process the hot-add? Spec says a software
> recommendation, but i think the cancel after 5 seconds seems better?

That approach seems more complicated.  It's better to stop blinking
and return to OFF_STATE if after the 5 second interval the slot is
found to be empty.

Thanks,

Lukas

      reply	other threads:[~2020-12-10 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-22  1:42 [Patch v2 1/1] PCI: pciehp: Add support for handling MRL events Ashok Raj
2020-11-22  9:08 ` Lukas Wunner
2020-11-25 22:40   ` Raj, Ashok
2020-12-03 22:51   ` Raj, Ashok
2020-12-10 20:57     ` Lukas Wunner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201210205719.GA25769@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.