From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.10
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 00:40:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201214054017.GA20381@codemonkey.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201214053147.GA24093@codemonkey.org.uk>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 03:03:29PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Ok, here it is - 5.10 is tagged and pushed out.
> >
> > I pretty much always wish that the last week was even calmer than it
> > was, and that's true here too. There's a fair amount of fixes in here,
> > including a few last-minute reverts for things that didn't get fixed,
> > but nothing makes me go "we need another week".
>
> ...
>
> > Mike Snitzer (1):
> > md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned
>
> Seems to be broken. This breaks mounting my raid6 partition:
>
> [ 87.290698] attempt to access beyond end of device
> md0: rw=4096, want=13996467328, limit=6261202944
> [ 87.293371] attempt to access beyond end of device
> md0: rw=4096, want=13998564480, limit=6261202944
> [ 87.296045] BTRFS warning (device md0): couldn't read tree root
> [ 87.300056] BTRFS error (device md0): open_ctree failed
>
> Reverting it goes back to the -rc7 behaviour where it mounts fine.
Another data point from the md setup in dmesg..
good:
[ 4.614957] md/raid:md0: device sdd1 operational as raid disk 3
[ 4.614960] md/raid:md0: device sda1 operational as raid disk 0
[ 4.614962] md/raid:md0: device sdc1 operational as raid disk 2
[ 4.614963] md/raid:md0: device sdf1 operational as raid disk 4
[ 4.614964] md/raid:md0: device sdg1 operational as raid disk 1
[ 4.615156] md/raid:md0: raid level 5 active with 5 out of 5 devices, algorithm 2
[ 4.645563] md0: detected capacity change from 0 to 12001828929536
bad:
[ 5.315036] md/raid:md0: device sda1 operational as raid disk 0
[ 5.316220] md/raid:md0: device sdd1 operational as raid disk 3
[ 5.317389] md/raid:md0: device sdc1 operational as raid disk 2
[ 5.318613] md/raid:md0: device sdf1 operational as raid disk 4
[ 5.319748] md/raid:md0: device sdg1 operational as raid disk 1
[ 5.321155] md/raid:md0: raid level 5 active with 5 out of 5 devices, algorithm 2
[ 5.370257] md0: detected capacity change from 0 to 3205735907328
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-13 23:03 Linux 5.10 Linus Torvalds
2020-12-14 5:31 ` Dave Jones
2020-12-14 5:40 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2020-12-14 5:52 ` Greg KH
2020-12-14 16:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-14 16:26 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2020-12-14 16:26 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-14 17:21 ` [dm-devel] " Jens Axboe
2020-12-14 17:21 ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-14 17:29 ` [dm-devel] " Dave Jones
2020-12-14 17:29 ` Dave Jones
2020-12-14 16:44 ` Greg KH
2020-12-14 17:06 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201214054017.GA20381@codemonkey.org.uk \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.