From: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>
To: syzbot <syzbot+cfa88ddd0655afa88763@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, bjorn.topel@intel.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net, hawk@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com,
kuba@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
magnus.karlsson@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: memory leak in xskq_create
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 13:11:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201216181135.GA94576@PWN> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0000000000002aca2e05b659af04@google.com>
Hi all,
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 06:53:10AM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0xffff88810f897940 (size 64):
> comm "syz-executor991", pid 8502, jiffies 4294942194 (age 14.080s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 7f 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> 00 a0 37 0c 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..7.............
> backtrace:
> [<00000000639d0dd1>] xskq_create+0x23/0xd0 include/linux/slab.h:552
> [<00000000b680b035>] xsk_init_queue net/xdp/xsk.c:508 [inline]
> [<00000000b680b035>] xsk_setsockopt+0x1c4/0x590 net/xdp/xsk.c:875
> [<000000002b302260>] __sys_setsockopt+0x1b0/0x360 net/socket.c:2132
> [<00000000ae03723e>] __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2143 [inline]
> [<00000000ae03723e>] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2140 [inline]
> [<00000000ae03723e>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x22/0x30 net/socket.c:2140
> [<0000000005c2b4a0>] do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
> [<0000000003db140f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
I have tested the following diff locally against syzbot's reproducer,
and sent a patch to it [1] for testing. I will send a real patch here
tomorrow if syzbot is happy about it. Please see explanation below.
--- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ void xp_destroy(struct xsk_buff_pool *pool)
if (!pool)
return;
+ xskq_destroy(pool->fq);
+ xskq_destroy(pool->cq);
+
kvfree(pool->heads);
kvfree(pool);
}
@@ -234,16 +237,6 @@ static void xp_release_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
xp_clear_dev(pool);
rtnl_unlock();
- if (pool->fq) {
- xskq_destroy(pool->fq);
- pool->fq = NULL;
- }
-
- if (pool->cq) {
- xskq_destroy(pool->cq);
- pool->cq = NULL;
- }
-
xdp_put_umem(pool->umem, false);
xp_destroy(pool);
}
When xsk_bind() allocates `xs->pool` but something else goes wrong:
xs->pool = xp_create_and_assign_umem(xs, xs->umem);
[...]
if (err) {
xp_destroy(xs->pool);
xp_destroy() doesn't free `pool->{f,c}q`, causing a memory leak. Move
`xskq_destroy(pool->{f,c}q)` from xp_release_deferred() to xp_destroy().
Also, since xskq_destroy() already does null check, I think it's
unnecessary to do it again here?
Thanks,
Peilin Ye
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=fea808dfe3c6dfdd6ba9778becbffe0b14e91294
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-16 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-13 14:53 memory leak in xskq_create syzbot
2020-12-16 18:11 ` Peilin Ye [this message]
2020-12-17 7:12 ` Björn Töpel
2020-12-17 7:50 ` Peilin Ye
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201216181135.GA94576@PWN \
--to=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+cfa88ddd0655afa88763@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.