From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, DPDK Techboard <techboard@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Minutes of Technical Board Meeting, 2020-12-16
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 08:52:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210104075226.GH2631@platinum> (raw)
Minutes of Technical Board Meeting, 2020-12-16
Members Attending
-----------------
- Bruce
- Ferruh
- Hemant
- Honnappa
- Jerin
- Kevin
- Konstantin
- Maxime
- Olivier (chair)
- Stephen
- Thomas
NOTE: The technical board meetings every second Wednesday on Jitsi [0]
at 3pm UTC. Meetings are public and DPDK community members are welcome
to attend.
NOTE: Next meeting will be on Wednesday 2021-01-13 @3pm UTC, and will be
chaired by Stephen.
1/ Lab investments
==================
Did current 101k /year investment reach the goal we set up earlier?
-------------------------------------------------------------------
- The lab is currently used for performance tests, CI
- It helped to find some functional bugs
- It is needed for baremetal tests or performance tests (which cannot be
done by a cloud test infrastructure)
- The infrastructure is there, we can use it better
Governing board asks about the proposal to add 30k /year to increase coverage
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposal is to increase from 20 to 40 hours per week coverage,
adding 2 more student employees.
One issue now is there is one person every 2 days. Is it possible to
have the same coverage hours, but having an every-day presence?
Governing board asks Techboard to come with a single name as lab owner
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A lab owner is a project manager that tracks what was agreed to do, and
find some help if needed. Ideally, it is a technical person used to
develop in DPDK.
No good solution was found. The following ideas have been mentioned:
a/ Round-robin from techboard? A quarterly basis is too short compared
to ramp-up time, and longer periods are too long for one person.
b/ Can it be managed by Linux Foundation? (maybe ask Trishan?)
c/ Nobody
Question to ask to Govboard:
- What is the detail of the costs (infrastructure, electricity, people)?
Distributed CI should be high priority, therefore sharing test scripts
is important. It might be easier for a company to pay someone working in
its own lab.
2/ Offline documentation (.pdf) support
=======================================
We can provide an offline-html (archive) format. Indeed, pdf is hard to
maintain, and html is a better format (can be interactive with CSS,
links between different guides, ...).
3/ DPDK build configuration - future enhancements
=================================================
AR to Bruce to create initial version of the DD.
No progress yet.
4/ Asia DPDK Event status
=========================
- CFP should be ready (waiting for translation in mandarin)
- Moderators
- AR: Techboard members to contact chineese colleagues and see who could
be interrested in moderating
- ~4 people are needed.
Ruifeng (arm) and Song (arm) kindly volunteered
5/ List of supported OS
=======================
Which distributions should be tested?
In user guide, there is no such list. It looks easier to just advertise
what we test.
6/ List of OS to test in the community lab (compilation and functional)
=======================================================================
- For compilation test: a long distribution list is possible
- For functional / performance test: test some distributions, for
instance: ubuntu-20.04, ubuntu-18.04, RHEL8, FreeBSD latest stable,
Windows
7/ Plan for KNI (deprecate? move?)
==================================
Postponed to next meeting
8/ Position regarding TRex using a DPDK fork
============================================
Postponed to next meeting
9/ Update on DTS usability
==========================
Postponed to next meeting
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-04 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-04 7:52 Olivier Matz [this message]
2021-01-12 15:53 ` [dpdk-dev] Minutes of Technical Board Meeting, 2020-12-16 Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210104075226.GH2631@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=techboard@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.