From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fs: block_dev: compute nr_vecs hint for improving writeback bvecs allocation
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 16:45:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210106084548.GA3845805@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210105183938.GA3878@lst.de>
On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 07:39:38PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> At least for iomap I think this is the wrong approach. Between the
> iomap and writeback_control we know the maximum size of the writeback
> request and can just use that.
I think writeback_control can tell us nothing about max pages in single
bio:
- wbc->nr_to_write controls how many pages to writeback, this pages
usually don't belong to same bio. Also this number is often much
bigger than BIO_MAX_PAGES.
- wbc->range_start/range_end is similar too, which is often much more
bigger than BIO_MAX_PAGES.
Also page/blocks_in_page can be mapped to different extent too, which is
only available when wpc->ops->map_blocks() is returned, which looks not
different with mpage_writepages(), in which bio is allocated with
BIO_MAX_PAGES vecs too.
Or you mean we can use iomap->length for this purpose? But iomap->length
still is still too big in case of xfs.
--
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-06 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-05 13:26 [RFC PATCH] fs: block_dev: compute nr_vecs hint for improving writeback bvecs allocation Ming Lei
2021-01-05 18:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-06 8:45 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-01-06 22:21 ` Dave Chinner
2021-01-08 7:59 ` Ming Lei
2021-01-08 21:00 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210106084548.GA3845805@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.