All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>,
	Eric Desrochers <eric.desrochers@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:07:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210106090758.GB3845805@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210105135419.68715-1-mfo@canonical.com>

On Tue, Jan 05, 2021 at 10:54:19AM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> There's an I/O error on fsync() in a detached loop device
> if it has been previously attached.
> 
> The issue is write cache is enabled in the attach path in
> loop_configure() but it isn't disabled in the detach path;
> thus it remains enabled in the block device regardless of
> whether it is attached or not.
> 
> Now fsync() can get an I/O request that will just be failed
> later in loop_queue_rq() as device's state is not 'Lo_bound'.
> 
> So, disable write cache in the detach path.
> 
> Test-case:
> 
>     # DEV=/dev/loop7
> 
>     # IMG=/tmp/image
>     # truncate --size 1M $IMG
> 
>     # losetup $DEV $IMG
>     # losetup -d $DEV
> 
> Before:
> 
>     # strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
>     fsync(3)                                = -1 EIO (Input/output error)
>     Warning: Error fsyncing/closing /dev/loop7: Input/output error
>     [  982.529929] blk_update_request: I/O error, dev loop7, sector 0 op 0x1:(WRITE) flags 0x800 phys_seg 0 prio class 0
> 
> After:
> 
>     # strace -e fsync parted -s $DEV print 2>&1 | grep fsync
>     fsync(3)                                = 0

But IO on detached loop should have been failed, right? The magic is
that submit_bio_checks() filters FLUSH request for queues which doesn't
support writeback cache, and always fake a normal completion.

I understand that the issue is that user becomes confused with this observation
because no such failure if they run 'parted -s /dev/loop0 print' on one detached
loop disk if it is never attached.


Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-06  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-05 13:54 [PATCH v2] loop: fix I/O error on fsync() in detached loop devices Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2021-01-06  9:07 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-01-06 23:33   ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2021-01-07  7:10     ` Ming Lei
2021-01-07 18:20       ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210106090758.GB3845805@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=eric.desrochers@canonical.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mfo@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.