From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, christian.perle@secunet.com,
steffen.klassert@secunet.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] net: fix netfilter defrag/ip tunnel pmtu blackhole
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 23:14:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210107221403.GA15712@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210105231523.622-1-fw@strlen.de>
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 12:15:20AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Christian Perle reported a PMTU blackhole due to unexpected interaction
> between the ip defragmentation that comes with connection tracking and
> ip tunnels.
>
> Unfortunately setting 'nopmtudisc' on the tunnel breaks the test
> scenario even without netfilter.
>
> Christinas setup looks like this:
> +--------+ +---------+ +--------+
> |Router A|-------|Wanrouter|-------|Router B|
> | |.IPIP..| |..IPIP.| |
> +--------+ +---------+ +--------+
> / mtu 1400 \
> / \
> +--------+ +--------+
> |Client A| |Client B|
> +--------+ +--------+
>
> MTU is 1500 everywhere, except on Router A to Wanrouter and
> Wanrouter to Router B.
>
> Router A and Router B use IPIP tunnel interfaces to tunnel traffic
> between Client A and Client B over WAN.
>
> Client A sends a 1400 byte UDP datagram to Client B.
> This packet gets encapsulated in the IPIP tunnel.
>
> This works, packet is received on client B.
>
> When conntrack (or anything else that forces ip defragmentation) is
> enabled on Router A, the packet gets dropped on Router A after
> encapsulation because they exceed the link MTU.
>
> Setting the 'nopmtudisc' flag on the IPIP tunnel makes things worse,
> no packets pass even in the no-netfilter scenario.
>
> Patch one is a reproducer script for selftest infra.
>
> Patch two is a fix for 'nopmtudisc' behaviour so ip_tunnel will send
> an icmp error to Client A. This allows 'nopmtudisc' tunnel to forward
> the UDP datagrams.
>
> Patch three enables ip refragmentation for all reassembled packets, just
> like ipv6.
Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-07 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-05 12:12 BUG: IPv4 conntrack reassembles forwarded packets Christian Perle
2021-01-05 12:12 ` Christian Perle
2021-01-05 23:15 ` [PATCH net 0/3] net: fix netfilter defrag/ip tunnel pmtu blackhole Florian Westphal
2021-01-05 23:15 ` [PATCH net 1/3] selftests: netfilter: add selftest for ipip pmtu discovery with enabled connection tracking Florian Westphal
2021-01-05 23:15 ` [PATCH net 2/3] net: fix pmtu check in nopmtudisc mode Florian Westphal
2021-01-05 23:15 ` [PATCH net 3/3] net: ip: always refragment ip defragmented packets Florian Westphal
2021-01-07 7:52 ` Christian Perle
2021-01-07 22:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2021-01-07 22:45 ` [PATCH net 0/3] net: fix netfilter defrag/ip tunnel pmtu blackhole Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210107221403.GA15712@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=christian.perle@secunet.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.