From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, andrew@lunn.ch,
f.fainelli@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
alexandru.marginean@nxp.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com, hongbo.wang@nxp.com, kuba@kernel.org,
jiri@resnulli.us, idosch@idosch.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 05/10] net: dsa: felix: perform teardown in reverse order of setup
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:59:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108175950.484854-6-olteanv@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108175950.484854-1-olteanv@gmail.com>
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
In general it is desirable that cleanup is the reverse process of setup.
In this case I am not seeing any particular issue, but with the
introduction of devlink-sb for felix, a non-obvious decision had to be
made as to where to put its cleanup method. When there's a convention in
place, that decision becomes obvious.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
---
Changes in v3:
None.
Changes in v2:
None.
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
index 79d0508e5910..42770a86e871 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
@@ -639,14 +639,13 @@ static void felix_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
struct felix *felix = ocelot_to_felix(ocelot);
int port;
- if (felix->info->mdio_bus_free)
- felix->info->mdio_bus_free(ocelot);
-
+ if (ocelot->ptp)
+ ocelot_deinit_timestamp(ocelot);
+ ocelot_deinit(ocelot);
for (port = 0; port < ocelot->num_phys_ports; port++)
ocelot_deinit_port(ocelot, port);
- ocelot_deinit_timestamp(ocelot);
- /* stop workqueue thread */
- ocelot_deinit(ocelot);
+ if (felix->info->mdio_bus_free)
+ felix->info->mdio_bus_free(ocelot);
}
static int felix_hwtstamp_get(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-08 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 17:59 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/10] Configuring congestion watermarks on ocelot switch using devlink-sb Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-08 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 01/10] net: mscc: ocelot: auto-detect packet buffer size and number of frame references Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-08 18:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-08 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 02/10] net: mscc: ocelot: add ops for decoding watermark threshold and occupancy Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-08 18:30 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-10 1:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-11 16:53 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-11 19:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-08 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 03/10] net: dsa: add ops for devlink-sb Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-08 18:20 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-01-08 18:31 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-08 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 04/10] net: dsa: felix: reindent struct dsa_switch_ops Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-08 18:33 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-10 1:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-11 17:01 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-11 19:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-08 17:59 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-01-08 18:34 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 05/10] net: dsa: felix: perform teardown in reverse order of setup Florian Fainelli
2021-01-08 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 06/10] net: mscc: ocelot: export NUM_TC constant from felix to common switch lib Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-08 18:34 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-08 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 07/10] net: mscc: ocelot: delete unused ocelot_set_cpu_port prototype Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-08 18:35 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-08 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 08/10] net: mscc: ocelot: register devlink ports Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-08 18:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-10 1:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-11 17:13 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-11 19:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-14 10:34 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-14 16:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-15 17:11 ` Renaming interfaces that are up (Was "Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 08/10] net: mscc: ocelot: register devlink") ports Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-15 19:54 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-10 2:01 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 08/10] net: mscc: ocelot: register devlink ports Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-08 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 09/10] net: mscc: ocelot: initialize watermarks to sane defaults Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-09 3:59 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-08 17:59 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 10/10] net: mscc: ocelot: configure watermarks using devlink-sb Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-09 4:03 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210108175950.484854-6-olteanv@gmail.com \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandru.marginean@nxp.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hongbo.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.