From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf stat: Introduce struct runtime_stat_data
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:22:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114132226.GA1409793@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cig3+P3Q+gAQNRQJJqB+wcNT+KVjo+9AU92AZ+QvP6ZAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 12:25:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:19 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:14:30PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > To pass more info to the saved_value in the runtime_stat, add a new
> > > struct runtime_stat_data. Currently it only has 'ctx' field but later
> > > patch will add more.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 346 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
> > > 1 file changed, 173 insertions(+), 173 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> > > index 901265127e36..a1565b6e38f2 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> > > @@ -114,6 +114,10 @@ static struct saved_value *saved_value_lookup(struct evsel *evsel,
> > >
> > > rblist = &st->value_list;
> > >
> > > + /* don't use context info for clock events */
> > > + if (type == STAT_NSECS)
> > > + dm.ctx = 0;
> > > +
> >
> > I think this should go to separate patch and be explained,
> > the change is advertised as adding struct for arguments
>
> Actually it was already there and I found it during this work.
> Basically it passes ctx for lookup but it uses 0 for time.
> Please see below..
ah nice, did not see that.. could be mentioned in the changelog ;-)
thanks,
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 6:14 [PATCH v2 1/2] perf stat: Introduce struct runtime_stat_data Namhyung Kim
2021-01-12 6:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] perf stat: Take cgroups into account for shadow stats Namhyung Kim
2021-01-13 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] perf stat: Introduce struct runtime_stat_data Jiri Olsa
2021-01-14 3:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-01-14 13:22 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-01-15 7:01 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210114132226.GA1409793@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.