From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADDAC433E6 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC5D22D2A for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394325AbhARUdP (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:33:15 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:11977 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388775AbhARKiq (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:38:46 -0500 IronPort-SDR: X8W3KY2KAi7Hh7nwtXNUS/V01PsXq/lz/r8bJECokesqxM8oFmiR3X75hWxpXWw/IsfZuxjMyR Nd7AKHknjt9w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9867"; a="165875940" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,356,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="165875940" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2021 02:36:58 -0800 IronPort-SDR: 4CKY186Jke9fZ2XXwQDWU/oL++KfjHpQW1zZrzgKm+INR6pXPFCZG3EhnZ5xYL0xzzO8mvqUI9 NH2kyEdoodWQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,356,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="399078589" Received: from paasikivi.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.42]) by fmsmga004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2021 02:36:55 -0800 Received: by paasikivi.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBA03208D7; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:36:53 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:36:53 +0200 From: Sakari Ailus To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Daniel Scally , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] software_node: Add kernel-doc comments to exported symbols Message-ID: <20210118103653.GY11878@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> References: <20210113000209.322218-1-djrscally@gmail.com> <20210118094945.GX11878@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> <20210118103355.GZ4077@smile.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210118103355.GZ4077@smile.fi.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:33:55PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:49:46AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 12:02:09AM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > > > > + * to_software_node() - Fetch software node associated with a firmware node handle > > > > Please wrap lines over 80 (unless there's a reason to keep them longer). > > Does kernel-doc behave good when you wrap the function summary line? It does, it's not uncommon to have it split across over multiple lines. -- Sakari Ailus