From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <keith.busch@wdc.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] nvme/hwmon: rework to avoid devm allocation
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 06:56:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119145632.GD54031@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119064318.124415-1-hare@suse.de>
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 07:43:18AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The original design to use device-managed resource allocation
> doesn't really work as the NVMe controller has a vastly different
> lifetime than the hwmon sysfs attributes, causing warning about
> duplicate sysfs entries upon reconnection.
> This patch reworks the hwmon allocation to avoid device-managed
> resource allocation, and uses the NVMe controller as parent for
> the sysfs attributes.
I don't really know enough about the nvme infrastructure to understand
this part of the change. Couple of questions: Why is the parent change
needed, and does the "sensors" command still work after this change ?
Guenter
>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Tested-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Maybe add
Fixes: 400b6a7b13a3f ("nvme: Add hardware monitoring support")
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvme/host/hwmon.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index fff49e544fdf..3c6c77e44bf7 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -4419,6 +4419,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_start_ctrl);
>
> void nvme_uninit_ctrl(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> {
> + nvme_hwmon_exit(ctrl);
> nvme_fault_inject_fini(&ctrl->fault_inject);
> dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_tolerance(ctrl->device);
> cdev_device_del(&ctrl->cdev, ctrl->device);
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/hwmon.c b/drivers/nvme/host/hwmon.c
> index 552dbc04567b..8f9e96986780 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/hwmon.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/hwmon.c
> @@ -223,12 +223,12 @@ static const struct hwmon_chip_info nvme_hwmon_chip_info = {
>
> int nvme_hwmon_init(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> {
> - struct device *dev = ctrl->dev;
> + struct device *dev = ctrl->device;
> struct nvme_hwmon_data *data;
> struct device *hwmon;
> int err;
>
> - data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> + data = kzalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!data)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -237,19 +237,30 @@ int nvme_hwmon_init(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
>
> err = nvme_hwmon_get_smart_log(data);
> if (err) {
> - dev_warn(ctrl->device,
> - "Failed to read smart log (error %d)\n", err);
> - devm_kfree(dev, data);
> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to read smart log (error %d)\n", err);
> + kfree(data);
> return err;
> }
>
> - hwmon = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, "nvme", data,
> - &nvme_hwmon_chip_info,
> - NULL);
> + hwmon = hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, "nvme",
> + data, &nvme_hwmon_chip_info,
> + NULL);
> if (IS_ERR(hwmon)) {
> dev_warn(dev, "Failed to instantiate hwmon device\n");
> - devm_kfree(dev, data);
> + kfree(data);
> }
> -
> + ctrl->hwmon_device = hwmon;
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +void nvme_hwmon_exit(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + if (ctrl->hwmon_device) {
> + struct nvme_hwmon_data *data =
> + dev_get_drvdata(ctrl->hwmon_device);
> +
> + hwmon_device_unregister(ctrl->hwmon_device);
> + ctrl->hwmon_device = NULL;
> + kfree(data);
> + }
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> index 88a6b97247f5..f51b942bb4f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> @@ -246,6 +246,9 @@ struct nvme_ctrl {
> struct rw_semaphore namespaces_rwsem;
> struct device ctrl_device;
> struct device *device; /* char device */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NVME_HWMON
> + struct device *hwmon_device;
> +#endif
> struct cdev cdev;
> struct work_struct reset_work;
> struct work_struct delete_work;
> @@ -809,11 +812,14 @@ static inline struct nvme_ns *nvme_get_ns_from_dev(struct device *dev)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_NVME_HWMON
> int nvme_hwmon_init(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
> +void nvme_hwmon_exit(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
> #else
> static inline int nvme_hwmon_init(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +static inline int nvme_hwmon_exit(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl) {}
> #endif
>
> u32 nvme_command_effects(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_ns *ns,
> --
> 2.29.2
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-19 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-19 6:43 [PATCHv2] nvme/hwmon: rework to avoid devm allocation Hannes Reinecke
2021-01-19 8:03 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-01-19 14:56 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2021-01-19 19:07 ` Hannes Reinecke
2021-01-20 5:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-01-27 16:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 12:37 ` Daniel Wagner
2021-01-19 22:18 ` Enzo Matsumiya
2021-02-10 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-10 12:10 ` Minwoo Im
2021-02-10 13:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210119145632.GD54031@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=keith.busch@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.