All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: inline rollback_registered_many()
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:25:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119202521.3108236-5-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119202521.3108236-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Similar to the change for rollback_registered() -
rollback_registered_many() was a part of unregister_netdevice_many()
minus the net_set_todo(), which is no longer needed.

Functionally this patch moves the list_empty() check back after:

	BUG_ON(dev_boot_phase);
	ASSERT_RTNL();

but I can't find any reason why that would be an issue.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index a7841d03c910..dee6488f8a31 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5709,7 +5709,7 @@ static void flush_all_backlogs(void)
 	}
 
 	/* we can have in flight packet[s] on the cpus we are not flushing,
-	 * synchronize_net() in rollback_registered_many() will take care of
+	 * synchronize_net() in unregister_netdevice_many() will take care of
 	 * them
 	 */
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, &flush_cpus)
@@ -10605,8 +10605,6 @@ void synchronize_net(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_net);
 
-static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head);
-
 /**
  *	unregister_netdevice_queue - remove device from the kernel
  *	@dev: device
@@ -10630,8 +10628,7 @@ void unregister_netdevice_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
 		LIST_HEAD(single);
 
 		list_add(&dev->unreg_list, &single);
-		rollback_registered_many(&single);
-		list_del(&single);
+		unregister_netdevice_many(&single);
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_queue);
@@ -10644,15 +10641,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_queue);
  *  we force a list_del() to make sure stack wont be corrupted later.
  */
 void unregister_netdevice_many(struct list_head *head)
-{
-	if (!list_empty(head)) {
-		rollback_registered_many(head);
-		list_del(head);
-	}
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_many);
-
-static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev, *tmp;
 	LIST_HEAD(close_head);
@@ -10660,6 +10648,9 @@ static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head)
 	BUG_ON(dev_boot_phase);
 	ASSERT_RTNL();
 
+	if (list_empty(head))
+		return;
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, head, unreg_list) {
 		/* Some devices call without registering
 		 * for initialization unwind. Remove those
@@ -10743,7 +10734,10 @@ static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head)
 		dev_put(dev);
 		net_set_todo(dev);
 	}
+
+	list_del(head);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_many);
 
 /**
  *	unregister_netdev - remove device from the kernel
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 20:25 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: inline rollback_registered() functions Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-19 20:25 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: move net_set_todo inside rollback_registered() Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-19 20:25 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: inline rollback_registered() Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-19 20:25 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: move rollback_registered_many() Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-19 20:25 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2021-01-19 23:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: inline rollback_registered() functions Edwin Peer
2021-01-21  5:05   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-21  5:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210119202521.3108236-5-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.