From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FEEC433E6 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08199230FE for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727364AbhASVuu (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:50:50 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45666 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728536AbhASVng (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 16:43:36 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 939B5230FE; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:42:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1611092573; bh=fq5GKahGqlF5MIqa4LWiqmDp3cXqG/DnnA3ZDvtoSgY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Emf4GsjdjZCRMU0y1OInzlu7vC9XXEYvD0BVSz+U2zQz7vij3fhhOOr5bHUWD89Ch 8lVYTGSiUFNe68BTge4eIzVApV70PX4lj0XU1k2Qc5tGTWChhOkFAOHHvVSav+P4xX BWFMivWibi9VQmqRlzNn9RT6kmtEtEMZgClzGu4XTeSzPmdjpyaKordnj6ya7p+dar p1WsySS9n72HPvYplPZlrQDUo6Dr1yp4YK5s04jYvAi5J2Lk9DXKMgxzG+2MC9nKPK 84uTyJrI1eKQwbsX7MA6wm6a6aYl0FB2D16HexxP2M3Sj1xE+viY6Dc4QLh+PwgIoG GMImP7PAIOusQ== Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:42:52 -0800 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Nathan Scott Cc: Bastian Germann , Eric Sandeen , xfs Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] debian: xfsprogs package clean-up Message-ID: <20210119214252.GU3134581@magnolia> References: <20210114183747.2507-1-bastiangermann@fishpost.de> <20210116092328.2667-1-bastiangermann@fishpost.de> <49ecc92b-6f67-5938-af41-209a0e303e8e@sandeen.net> <522af0f2-8485-148f-1ec2-96576925f88e@fishpost.de> <3a1bd0e4-a4b2-5822-ed1a-d9a443b8ace7@fishpost.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 08:26:45AM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote: > Hey all, > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 4:16 AM Bastian Germann > wrote: > > [...] > > Nathan uploaded most of the versions, so I guess he can upload. > > The Debian package is "team maintained" though with this list address as > > recorded maintainer. > > > > You should have the necessary permissions to do uploads since > yesterday Bastian - is that not the case? > > BTW Eric, not directly related but I think the -rc versions being > added to the debian/changelog can lead to some confusion - I *think* > dpkg finds that version suffix to be more recent than the actual > release version string (seems odd, but that seemed to be the behaviour > I observed recently). Could the release script(s) skip adding -rc > versions to debian/changelog? The release maintainer could also skip adding the ~rc tags to debian/changelog since it's not like we're going to upload /that/ into debian anyway. All of my internal builds add their own tag with dch, so it wouldn't matter much to me. (But let's see if Dave has opinions...) --D > cheers. > > -- > Nathan >