From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: tiwai@suse.de, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, broonie@kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: SOF: SND_INTEL_DSP_CONFIG dependency
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:56:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210122052621.GI2771@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122005725.94163-3-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
On 21-01-21, 18:57, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> The sof-pci-dev driver fails to link when built into the kernel
> and CONFIG_SND_INTEL_DSP_CONFIG is set to =m:
>
> arm-linux-gnueabi-ld: sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.o: in function `sof_pci_probe':
> sof-pci-dev.c:(.text+0x1c): undefined reference to `snd_intel_dsp_driver_probe'
>
> As a temporary fix, use IS_REACHABLE to prevent the problem from
> happening. A more complete solution is to move this code to
> Intel-specific parts, restructure the drivers and Kconfig as discussed
> with Arnd Bergmann and Takashi Iwai.
>
> Fixes: 82d9d54a6c0e ("ALSA: hda: add Intel DSP configuration / probe code")
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/sof/sof-acpi-dev.c | 11 ++++++-----
> sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c | 10 ++++++----
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/sof-acpi-dev.c b/sound/soc/sof/sof-acpi-dev.c
> index 2a369c2c6551..cc2e257087e4 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sof/sof-acpi-dev.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/sof-acpi-dev.c
> @@ -131,12 +131,13 @@ static int sof_acpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!id)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - ret = snd_intel_acpi_dsp_driver_probe(dev, id->id);
> - if (ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_ANY && ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_SOF) {
> - dev_dbg(dev, "SOF ACPI driver not selected, aborting probe\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SND_INTEL_DSP_CONFIG)) {
> + ret = snd_intel_acpi_dsp_driver_probe(dev, id->id);
> + if (ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_ANY && ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_SOF) {
> + dev_dbg(dev, "SOF ACPI driver not selected, aborting probe\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
should the else case be to continue, is the DSP not critical for the
driver to work..?
> }
> -
Seems unrelated change
> dev_dbg(dev, "ACPI DSP detected");
>
> sof_pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*sof_pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c b/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c
> index 7757463bd81a..388772f9c4d2 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sof/sof-pci-dev.c
> @@ -346,10 +346,12 @@ static int sof_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci,
> const struct snd_sof_dsp_ops *ops;
> int ret;
>
> - ret = snd_intel_dsp_driver_probe(pci);
> - if (ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_ANY && ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_SOF) {
> - dev_dbg(&pci->dev, "SOF PCI driver not selected, aborting probe\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SND_INTEL_DSP_CONFIG)) {
> + ret = snd_intel_dsp_driver_probe(pci);
> + if (ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_ANY && ret != SND_INTEL_DSP_DRIVER_SOF) {
> + dev_dbg(&pci->dev, "SOF PCI driver not selected, aborting probe\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> }
> dev_dbg(&pci->dev, "PCI DSP detected");
>
> --
> 2.25.1
--
~Vinod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 5:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-22 0:57 [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: SOF: partial fix to Kconfig issues Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-01-22 0:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: SOF: Intel: soundwire: fix select/depend unmet dependencies Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-01-22 0:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] ASoC: SOF: SND_INTEL_DSP_CONFIG dependency Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-01-22 5:26 ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2021-01-22 8:58 ` Takashi Iwai
2021-01-22 15:38 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-01-22 18:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-23 8:08 ` Takashi Iwai
2021-01-25 14:17 ` [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: SOF: partial fix to Kconfig issues Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210122052621.GI2771@vkoul-mobl \
--to=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.