From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@arm.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, mhiramat@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tracing: precise log info for kretprobe addr err
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:19:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210125181926.GA10248@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210125160108.2147511-1-Jianlin.Lv@arm.com>
On 01/26, Jianlin Lv wrote:
>
> When trying to create kretprobe with the wrong function symbol in tracefs;
> The error is triggered in the register_trace_kprobe() and recorded as
> FAIL_REG_PROBE issue,
>
> Example:
> $ cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
> $ echo 'r:myprobe ERROR_SYMBOL_XXX ret=%x0' >> kprobe_events
> bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
> $ cat error_log
> [142797.347877] trace_kprobe: error: Failed to register probe event
> Command: r:myprobe ERROR_SYMBOL_XXX ret=%x0
> ^
>
> This error can be detected in the parameter parsing stage, the effect of
> applying this patch is as follows:
>
> $ echo 'r:myprobe ERROR_SYMBOL_XXX ret=%x0' >> kprobe_events
> bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
> $ cat error_log
> [415.89]trace_kprobe: error: Retprobe address must be an function entry
> Command: r:myprobe ERROR_SYMBOL_XXX ret=%x0
IOW, the "offset != 0" check removed by this patch is obviously wrong, right?
Agreed, but...
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
> @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static int trace_kprobe_create(int argc, const char *argv[])
> flags |= TPARG_FL_RETURN;
> if (kprobe_on_func_entry(NULL, symbol, offset))
> flags |= TPARG_FL_FENTRY;
> - if (offset && is_return && !(flags & TPARG_FL_FENTRY)) {
> + if (!strchr(symbol, ':') && is_return && !(flags & TPARG_FL_FENTRY)) {
but why did you add the strchr(':') check instead?
I was really puzzled until I found the this email from Masami:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210120131406.5a992c1e434681750a0cd5d4@kernel.org/
So I leave this to you and Masami, but perhaps you can document this check at
least in the changelog?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-25 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-25 16:01 [PATCH v3] tracing: precise log info for kretprobe addr err Jianlin Lv
2021-01-25 18:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2021-01-25 18:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-01-26 4:15 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-26 10:02 ` Jianlin Lv
2021-01-26 20:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-01-26 20:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-01-26 21:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2021-01-26 21:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-01-27 2:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-27 2:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-27 2:46 ` Jianlin Lv
2021-01-27 13:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-27 14:25 ` Jianlin Lv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210125181926.GA10248@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=Jianlin.Lv@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.