From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
pkrempa@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] machine: add missing doc for memory-backend option
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 15:09:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210127150950.GO3653144@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <756c025a-3811-4a36-98a2-3a02bd756523@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:24:26PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 1/27/21 11:54 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:45:11AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:15:04AM -0500, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > > How does a mgmt app know which machine types need to use this
> > > option ? The machine type names are opaque strings, and apps
> > > must not attempt to parse or interpret the version number
> > > inside the machine type name, as they can be changed by
> > > distros. IOW, saying to use it for machine types 4.0 and
> > > older isn't a valid usage strategy IMHO.
> >
> > Looking at the libvirt patch, we do indeed use his property
> > unconditionally for all machine types, precisely because parsing
> > version numbers from the machine type is not allowed.
> >
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2021-January/msg00633.html
> >
> > So this doc is telling apps to do something that isn't viable
>
> The other approach that I was suggesting was, that QEMU stops reporting
> 'default-ram-id' for affected machine types. The way the switch from '-m
> XMB' to memory-backend-* was implemented in libvirt is that if libvirt sees
> 'default-ram-id' attribute for given machine type it uses memory-backend-*
> otherwise it falls back to -m.
>
> Since we know which machine types are "broken", we can stop reporting the
> attribute and thus stop tickling this bug. I agree that it puts more burden
> on distro maintainers to backport the change, but I think it's acceptable
> risk.
IIUC That's only a burden for distros if they're creating their own
machine types, in which case they've already decided the burden is
a net win.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-27 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-21 16:15 [PATCH v3] machine: add missing doc for memory-backend option Igor Mammedov
2021-01-27 10:40 ` Michal Privoznik
2021-01-27 10:45 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-01-27 10:54 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-01-27 14:24 ` Michal Privoznik
2021-01-27 15:09 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2021-01-27 15:35 ` Igor Mammedov
2021-01-27 17:03 ` Michal Privoznik
2021-01-27 19:31 ` Igor Mammedov
2021-01-27 17:56 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-01-27 18:30 ` Michal Privoznik
2021-01-27 18:41 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-01-27 19:19 ` Igor Mammedov
2021-02-04 12:21 ` Michal Privoznik
2021-02-05 15:56 ` Igor Mammedov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210127150950.GO3653144@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mprivozn@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.