All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
	allison.henderson@oracle.com, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Fix 'set but not used' warning in xfs_bmap_compute_alignments()
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:34:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210128153412.GD2599027@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210127090537.2640164-1-chandanrlinux@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 02:35:37PM +0530, Chandan Babu R wrote:
> With both CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG and CONFIG_XFS_WARN disabled, the only reference to
> local variable "error" in xfs_bmap_compute_alignments() gets eliminated during
> pre-processing stage of the compilation process. This causes the compiler to
> generate a "set but not used" warning.
> 
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanrlinux@gmail.com>
> ---
> This patch is applicable on top of current xfs-linux/for-next branch.
> 
>  fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> index 2cd24bb06040..ba56554e8c05 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
> @@ -3471,7 +3471,6 @@ xfs_bmap_compute_alignments(
>  	struct xfs_mount	*mp = args->mp;
>  	xfs_extlen_t		align = 0; /* minimum allocation alignment */
>  	int			stripe_align = 0;
> -	int			error;
>  
>  	/* stripe alignment for allocation is determined by mount parameters */
>  	if (mp->m_swidth && (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_SWALLOC))
> @@ -3484,10 +3483,10 @@ xfs_bmap_compute_alignments(
>  	else if (ap->datatype & XFS_ALLOC_USERDATA)
>  		align = xfs_get_extsz_hint(ap->ip);
>  	if (align) {
> -		error = xfs_bmap_extsize_align(mp, &ap->got, &ap->prev,
> -						align, 0, ap->eof, 0, ap->conv,
> -						&ap->offset, &ap->length);
> -		ASSERT(!error);
> +		if (xfs_bmap_extsize_align(mp, &ap->got, &ap->prev,
> +			align, 0, ap->eof, 0, ap->conv, &ap->offset,
> +			&ap->length))
> +			ASSERT(0);

I was wondering if we should just make xfs_bmap_extsize_align() return
void and push the asserts down into the function itself, but it looks
like xfs_bmap_rtalloc() actually handles the error. Any idea on why we
might have that inconsistency?

Brian

>  		ASSERT(ap->length);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.29.2
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-28 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-27  9:05 [PATCH] xfs: Fix 'set but not used' warning in xfs_bmap_compute_alignments() Chandan Babu R
2021-01-28 15:34 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2021-01-28 17:44   ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-29  7:40     ` Chandan Babu R
     [not found]       ` <20210129124638.GA2660974@bfoster>
2021-01-29 17:08         ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210128153412.GD2599027@bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=allison.henderson@oracle.com \
    --cc=chandanrlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.