From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: recalculate segment count for multi-segment discard requests correctly
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:35:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210203023517.GA948998@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210202204355.GA31803@redhat>
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:43:55PM -0500, David Jeffery wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 11:33:43AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:48:50AM -0500, David Jeffery wrote:
> > > When a stacked block device inserts a request into another block device
> > > using blk_insert_cloned_request, the request's nr_phys_segments field gets
> > > recalculated by a call to blk_recalc_rq_segments in
> > > blk_cloned_rq_check_limits. But blk_recalc_rq_segments does not know how to
> > > handle multi-segment discards. For disk types which can handle
> > > multi-segment discards like nvme, this results in discard requests which
> > > claim a single segment when it should report several, triggering a warning
> > > in nvme and causing nvme to fail the discard from the invalid state.
> > >
> > > WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 191 at drivers/nvme/host/core.c:700 nvme_setup_discard+0x170/0x1e0 [nvme_core]
> > > ...
> > > nvme_setup_cmd+0x217/0x270 [nvme_core]
> > > nvme_loop_queue_rq+0x51/0x1b0 [nvme_loop]
> > > __blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0xe7/0x1b0
> > > blk_mq_request_issue_directly+0x41/0x70
> > > ? blk_account_io_start+0x40/0x50
> > > dm_mq_queue_rq+0x200/0x3e0
> > > blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x10a/0x7d0
> > > ? __sbitmap_queue_get+0x25/0x90
> > > ? elv_rb_del+0x1f/0x30
> > > ? deadline_remove_request+0x55/0xb0
> > > ? dd_dispatch_request+0x181/0x210
> > > __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x144/0x290
> > > ? bio_attempt_discard_merge+0x134/0x1f0
> > > __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x129/0x180
> > > blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x30/0x60
> > > __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x47/0xe0
> > > __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x15b/0x170
> > > blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x68/0xe0
> > > blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0xf0/0x170
> > > blk_finish_plug+0x36/0x50
> > > xlog_cil_committed+0x19f/0x290 [xfs]
> > > xlog_cil_process_committed+0x57/0x80 [xfs]
> > > xlog_state_do_callback+0x1e0/0x2a0 [xfs]
> > > xlog_ioend_work+0x2f/0x80 [xfs]
> > > process_one_work+0x1b6/0x350
> > > worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
> > > ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350
> > > kthread+0x11b/0x140
> > > ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
> > > ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> > >
> > > This patch fixes blk_recalc_rq_segments to be aware of devices which can
> > > have multi-segment discards. It calculates the correct discard segment
> > > count by counting the number of bio as each discard bio is considered its
> > > own segment.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@redhat.com>
> > > Tested-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > block/blk-merge.c | 7 +++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> > > index 808768f6b174..fe7358bd5d09 100644
> > > --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> > > +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> > > @@ -382,6 +382,13 @@ unsigned int blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
> > >
> > > switch (bio_op(rq->bio)) {
> > > case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> > > + if (queue_max_discard_segments(rq->q) > 1) {
> > > + struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
> > > + for_each_bio(bio)
> > > + nr_phys_segs++;
> > > + return nr_phys_segs;
> > > + }
> > > + /* fall through */
> > > case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
> >
> > REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE needs to be covered since block layer treats
> > the two in very similar way from discard viewpoint.
> >
> > Also single range discard should be fixed too, since block layer
> > thinks single-range discard req segment is 1. Otherwise, the warning in
> > virtblk_setup_discard_write_zeroes() still may be triggered, at least.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ming
> >
>
> The return 0 does seem to be an old relic that does not make sense anymore.
> Moving REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE to be with discard and removing the old return 0,
> is this what you had in mind?
>
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 808768f6b174..68458aa01b05 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -383,8 +383,14 @@ unsigned int blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
> switch (bio_op(rq->bio)) {
> case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
> case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
> + if (queue_max_discard_segments(rq->q) > 1) {
> + struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
> + for_each_bio(bio)
> + nr_phys_segs++;
> + return nr_phys_segs;
> + }
> + /* fall through */
> case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
> - return 0;
> case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
> return 1;
WRITE_SAME uses same buffer, so the nr_segment is still one; WRITE_ZERO
doesn't need extra payload, so nr_segments is zero, see
blk_bio_write_zeroes_split(), blk_bio_write_same_split, attempt_merge()
and blk_rq_merge_ok().
--
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-03 2:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 16:48 [PATCH] block: recalculate segment count for multi-segment discard requests correctly David Jeffery
2021-02-02 3:33 ` Ming Lei
2021-02-02 20:43 ` David Jeffery
2021-02-03 2:35 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-02-03 3:15 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-03 13:50 ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-03 15:08 ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-03 3:18 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-02-03 16:23 ` David Jeffery
2021-02-04 2:18 ` Ming Lei
2021-02-04 2:27 ` Ming Lei
2021-02-04 16:43 ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-08 18:53 ` Laurence Oberman
2021-02-08 18:58 ` John Pittman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210203023517.GA948998@T590 \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=djeffery@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.