All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>,
	Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] netfilter: conntrack: Check offload bit on table dump
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 13:50:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210203125035.GC16570@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a908ac8f-1fb4-1427-520d-3a702ecb7597@nvidia.com>

Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > Do you think rhashtable_insert_fast() in flow_offload_add() blocks for
> > dozens of seconds?
> 
> I'm not sure. but its not only that but also the time to be in
> established state as only then we offload.

That makes it even more weird.  Timeout for established is even larger.
In case of TCP, its days... so I don't understand at all :/

> > Thats about the only thing I can see between 'offload bit gets set'
> > and 'timeout is extended' in flow_offload_add() that could at least
> > spend *some* time.
> > 
> > > We hit this issue before more easily and pushed this fix
> > > 
> > > 4203b19c2796 netfilter: flowtable: Set offload timeout when adding flow
> > 
> > This fix makes sense to me.
> 
> I just noted we didn't test correctly Pablo's suggestion instead of
> to check the bit and extend the timeout in ctnetlink_dump_table() and
> ct_seq_show() like GC does.

Ok.  Extending it there makes sense, but I still don't understand
why newly offloaded flows hit this problem.

Flow offload should never see a 'about to expire' ct entry.
The 'extend timeout from gc' is more to make sure GC doesn't reap
long-lived entries that have been offloaded aeons ago, not 'prevent
new flows from getting zapped...'

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-03 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28  7:40 [PATCH net 1/1] netfilter: conntrack: Check offload bit on table dump Roi Dayan
2021-01-30 12:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
     [not found]   ` <3a29e9b5-7bf8-5c00-3ede-738f9b4725bf@nvidia.com>
     [not found]     ` <997cbda4-acd1-a000-1408-269bc5c3abf3@nvidia.com>
2021-02-01  3:08       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-02-01  7:53         ` Roi Dayan
2021-02-01 11:50           ` Florian Westphal
2021-02-01 15:04             ` Roi Dayan
2021-02-01 15:25               ` Florian Westphal
2021-02-02 17:08                 ` Roi Dayan
2021-02-03 12:50                   ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-02-07  8:38                     ` Roi Dayan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210203125035.GC16570@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ozsh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
    --cc=roid@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.