All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-mem: add spi_mem_dtr_supports_op()
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:44:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210205104413.5e873c0e@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204141218.32229-1-p.yadav@ti.com>

Hi Pratyush,

Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com> wrote on Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:42:17 +0530:

> spi_mem_default_supports_op() rejects DTR ops by default to ensure that
> the controller drivers that haven't been updated with DTR support
> continue to reject them. It also makes sure that controllers that don't
> support DTR mode at all (which is most of them at the moment) also
> reject them.
> 
> This means that controller drivers that want to support DTR mode can't
> use spi_mem_default_supports_op(). Driver authors have to roll their own
> supports_op() function and mimic the buswidth checks. See
> spi-cadence-quadspi.c for example. Or even worse, driver authors might
> skip it completely or get it wrong.
> 
> Add spi_mem_dtr_supports_op(). It provides a basic sanity check for DTR
> ops and performs the buswidth requirement check. Move the logic for
> checking buswidth in spi_mem_default_supports_op() to a separate
> function so the logic is not repeated twice.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@ti.com>

I am not a SPI-NOR expert but for what I know this approach looks good
to me. Let's see what other maintainers think.

Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>

Thanks,
Miquèl

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05  9:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-04 14:12 [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-mem: add spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() Pratyush Yadav
2021-02-04 14:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] spi: cadence-quadspi: Use spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() Pratyush Yadav
2021-02-05  9:44 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-02-11 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-mem: add spi_mem_dtr_supports_op() Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210205104413.5e873c0e@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.yadav@ti.com \
    --cc=zhengxunli@mxic.com.tw \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.