From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
To: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, osandov@osandov.com,
urezki@gmail.com, serapheim@delphix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: use rb_tree instead of list for vread() lookups
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 20:49:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210209194937.GA2452@pc638.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210209190253.108763-1-serapheim@delphix.com>
> vread() has been linearly searching vmap_area_list for looking up
> vmalloc areas to read from. These same areas are also tracked by
> a rb_tree (vmap_area_root) which offers logarithmic lookup.
>
> This patch modifies vread() to use the rb_tree structure instead
> of the list and the speedup for heavy /proc/kcore readers can
> be pretty significant. Below are the wall clock measurements of
> a Python application that leverages the drgn debugging library
> to read and interpret data read from /proc/kcore.
>
> Before the patch:
> -----
> $ time sudo sdb -e 'dbuf | head 3000 | wc'
> (unsigned long)3000
>
> real 0m22.446s
> user 0m2.321s
> sys 0m20.690s
> -----
>
> With the patch:
> -----
> $ time sudo sdb -e 'dbuf | head 3000 | wc'
> (unsigned long)3000
>
> real 0m2.104s
> user 0m2.043s
> sys 0m0.921s
> -----
>
> Signed-off-by: Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheim@delphix.com>
> ---
> Changed in v2:
>
> - Use __find_vmap_area() for initial lookup but keep iteration via
> va->list.
>
> mm/vmalloc.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
> index 49ab9b6c001d..eb133d000394 100644
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@ -2860,7 +2860,10 @@ long vread(char *buf, char *addr, unsigned long count)
> count = -(unsigned long) addr;
>
> spin_lock(&vmap_area_lock);
> - list_for_each_entry(va, &vmap_area_list, list) {
> + va = __find_vmap_area((unsigned long)addr);
> + if (!va)
> + goto finished;
> + list_for_each_entry_from(va, &vmap_area_list, list) {
> if (!count)
> break;
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Much better :)
Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
--
Vlad Rezki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-09 19:02 [PATCH v2] mm/vmalloc: use rb_tree instead of list for vread() lookups Serapheim Dimitropoulos
2021-02-09 19:49 ` Uladzislau Rezki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210209194937.GA2452@pc638.lan \
--to=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=serapheim.dimitro@delphix.com \
--cc=serapheim@delphix.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.